Re: Is the OPL DFSG-ok?
Mason, I'm quoting your entire message below for the people at
opencontent.org to read.
For the people at opencontent.org, please reply to
debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Marcelo
On Mon, Mar 08, 1999 at 01:42:04PM -0500, Mason Loring Bliss wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 08, 1999 at 12:10:54PM -0600, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
>
> > OpenContent License (OPL)
> > Version 1.0, July 14, 1998.
>
> Hm. This is just a guess, but my guess is that this hasn't been run
> through a lawyer. The language is fairly imprecise in places, and there
> are grammatical errors. The license treats the word "OpenContent" as having
> implicit meaning. The quality of language in the license doesn't lend itself
> to erasing ambiguities.
>
> Personally, I wouldn't use it until it has been greatly cleaned up.
>
> Just my opinion...
>
> --
> Mason Loring Bliss (( "In the drowsy dark cave of the mind dreams
> mason@acheron.middleboro.ma.us )) build their nest with fragments dropped
> http://acheron.ne.mediaone.net (( from day's caravan." - Rabindranath Tagore
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: