Re: Is the OPL DFSG-ok?

[Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>]

On Sun, 7 Mar 1999, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:

>  subject says it all, is the OpenContent License DFGS-ok?... now that
>  I think about it, shouldn't that be OCL?  The _text_ of the OPL says
>  "OpenContent License", not "OpenContent Public License".
> 
>  If the answer is yes, 
> 
>     a) can it be added to the DFSG as a DFSG-ok license?  How does one
>        achieve this? (in other words, who shall be bugged?)

The list given in the DFSG is not meant to be comprehensive. We don't
have to add every DFSG-compliant license to it.

>     b) shouldn't it be shipped in /usr/doc/copyright?

Same as before.

-- 
 "a229ea764512f7048edf12f09fc0a061" (a truly random sig)