[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: The 'CMU' license

On 4 Feb 1999, John Hasler wrote:

> Jules Bean wrote:
> > How do we feel about the phrase 'without fee' in this context?
> Brian Ristuccia wrote:
> > Sounds to me like this means "without paying CMU any money", not "you can't
> > charge any money."
> Jules Bean writes:
> > I also think that's what they mean.
> I agree, though I wish they wouldn't use that ambiguous phrasing.  It would
> be better to omit all reference to fees as does UC.  Fat chance of getting
> CMU to change it, though.  IMHO it's ok for main.

You're right.  

I do actually have the email address of someone in a position to change
things at CMU.. I'll put our case politely to him.

In any case, I'll go ahead with my intent-to-package!


|  Jelibean aka  | jules@jellybean.co.uk         |  6 Evelyn Rd	       |
|  Jules aka     | jules@debian.org              |  Richmond, Surrey   |
|  Julian Bean   | jmlb2@hermes.cam.ac.uk        |  TW9 2TF *UK*       |
|  War doesn't demonstrate who's right... just who's left.             |
|  When privacy is outlawed... only the outlaws have privacy.          |

Reply to: