Re: The 'CMU' license
On Thu, 4 Feb 1999, Brian Ristuccia wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 04, 1999 at 06:46:56PM +0000, Jules Bean wrote:
> >
> > I'm trying to package a shiny new rarpd for Debian which carries this
> > license.
> >
> > How do we feel about the phrase 'without fee' in this context?
> >
>
> Sounds to me like this means "without paying CMU any money", not "you can't
> charge any money."
I also think that's what they mean.
However, we've disagreed about clauses like this before ('we' being the
list, not anyone in particular).
Jules
/----------------+-------------------------------+---------------------\
| Jelibean aka | jules@jellybean.co.uk | 6 Evelyn Rd |
| Jules aka | jules@debian.org | Richmond, Surrey |
| Julian Bean | jmlb2@hermes.cam.ac.uk | TW9 2TF *UK* |
+----------------+-------------------------------+---------------------+
| War doesn't demonstrate who's right... just who's left. |
| When privacy is outlawed... only the outlaws have privacy. |
\----------------------------------------------------------------------/
Reply to: