Re: New LyX Clarification
On Fri, 29 Jan 1999, David Starner wrote:
> http://www.lyx.org/license.html has a new clarification - this appears
> to be more than enough to solve our problems. (IMO) All we need to do is
> add that to the copyright file. Does anyone disagree, and want to hold
> the bug open after that is done?
>
> The maintainer doesn't appear to be responding. If the mantainer's not
> around, maybe someone can do a NMU, as this is a Slink critical bug?
Seems like a DFSG-free, if rather agressively worded ;) license.
Let's wait for another opinion, though (John?)
Jules
/----------------+-------------------------------+---------------------\
| Jelibean aka | jules@jellybean.co.uk | 6 Evelyn Rd |
| Jules aka | jules@debian.org | Richmond, Surrey |
| Julian Bean | jmlb2@hermes.cam.ac.uk | TW9 2TF *UK* |
+----------------+-------------------------------+---------------------+
| War doesn't demonstrate who's right... just who's left. |
| When privacy is outlawed... only the outlaws have privacy. |
\----------------------------------------------------------------------/
Reply to: