Re: Not inherently free, but inherently non-free?
On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 12:23:51PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
<Big snip; big extrapolation>
> Actually, the GFDL is quite clear: you aren't allowed distribute on an
> encypted medium even if it's accompanied by a freely readable medium -- you
> can't even *make* a copy on an encrypted medium, according to the line I
> quoted above. Yes, this is the problem.
Hmm. So if I have an hardware encryption passthrough on my computer, I
could not have any GFDL works installed at all? :)
Reply to: