Re: Acer TravelMate 3043WTMi
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 11:47:07AM +0530, Kurian Thayil wrote:
From: Kurian Thayil <kurianmthayil@gmail.com>
To: James Brown <jbrownfirst@gmail.com>
Cc: debian-laptop@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Acer TravelMate 3043WTMi
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on liszt.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=LDOSUBSCRIBER,LDO_WHITELIST
autolearn=failed version=3.2.3
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1
Hello James,
The reason I asked, I am using Acer Aspire 5583NWXMi series notebook. It
has a webcam. I wasn't able to configure it successfully with Debian
Etch or Lenny. If you have any tip or once you configure yours, please
Hello,
if this can help you, my webcam works fine whith "cheese".
My box is an acer aspire wmli 5102
I use sid.
My webcam works fine with the kernels 2.6.28 and 2.6.29 (packages
debian) but it doesn't work with the kernel 2.6.26.
demsg gives: (with kernel 2.6.28/29)
----------------------------------8<--------------------------------------------
[ 12.213334] acer-wmi: Acer Laptop ACPI-WMI Extras
[ 12.224235] Registered led device: acer-wmi::mail
[ 12.233061] wifi0: Atheros AR2413 chip found (MAC 7.8, PHY 2112A 4.5, Radio 5.6)
[ 12.245289] gspca: main v2.3.0 registered
[ 12.266900] gspca: probing 0402:5602
[ 12.266955] ALi m5602: Probing for a po1030 sensor
[ 12.290839] ath_pci: wifi0: Atheros 2413: mem=0xc0200000, irq=22
[ 12.294552] udev: renamed network interface ath0 to ath1
[ 12.305558] ALi m5602: Probing for a mt9m111 sensor
[ 12.326967] ALi m5602: Probing for a s5k4aa sensor
[ 12.351923] ALi m5602: Probing for an ov9650 sensor
[ 12.368074] ALi m5602: Probing for a s5k83a sensor
[ 12.396060] ALi m5602: Detected a s5k83a sensor
[ 12.625795] gspca: probe ok
[ 12.625874] usbcore: registered new interface driver ALi m5602
[ 12.625924] ALi m5602: registered
----------------------------------8<--------------------------------------------
(I notice that kernel 2.6.28 disappears of sid but kernel 2.6.29 exits)
hth
--
Gérard
Reply to: