[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: how to determine number of displays



On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 11:12 AM, Rich Healey <healey.rich@gmail.com> wrote:
> LI Daobing wrote:
>  > Hello,
>  >
>  > On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Rich Healey <healey.rich@gmail.com> wrote:
>  >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>  >>  Hash: SHA1
>  >>
>  >>  Hi list.
>  >>
>  >>  I'm playing with X on my asus M6 notebook, debian Lenny with bits of
>  >>  experimental and unstable to support KDE 4 (though i run E17 995 of the
>  >>  time, just wanted to play with KDE).
>  >>
>  >>  Anyway, i use dual screens at work, and just builtin at home, i was
>  >>  wanting to know if there's somethingi  can poll before X actually fires
>  >>  up to see what displays are attached?
>  >>
>  >>  My goal is to write an init script that wills start before entrance and
>  >>  symlink an appropriate xorg.conf for the number of screens attached to
>  >>  /etc/X11/xorg.conf ...
>  >>
>  >
>  > I use a single /etc/X11/xorg.conf with a modifed Screen Section[1](add
>  > a Virtual line).
>  >
>  > then use 'xrandr --output VGA --auto --output LVDS --auto --right-of
>  > VGA' to turn on dual head support.
>  >
>  > [1]
>  > Section "Screen"
>  >         Identifier      "Default Screen"
>  >         Device          "Intel Corporation Mobile GM965/GL960
>  > Integrated Graphics Controller"
>  >         Monitor         "Generic Monitor"
>  >         DefaultDepth    24
>  >         SubSection "Display"
>  >                 Virtual 2560 1024
>  >                 Modes           "1280x800"
>  >         EndSubSection
>  > EndSection
>  >
>  >
>
>  Thanks right now i use Xrandr, but there are bugs (maximising windows
>  puts them half on each screen.)
>
>  On my debian desktop with an ATI card this works perfectly, so i'm
>  working towards that solution.
>
>  Is that screen section for the primary or secondary? do you only have
>  one screen line?

yes, only one screen line.

>
>  Don't get me wrong, xrandr works well, but i feel there's potential to
>  have it working better.

I don't know about this, :)


-- 
Best Regards,
 LI Daobing


Reply to: