Re: Loss of hardware acceleration after fglrx upgrade to 8.28.8-0.1 in sid on a Thinkpad T43
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
LUK ShunTim schrieb:
> Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
>> For diagnosis purpose try the following
>
> First of thanks very for the help. I tried it again; same result, ie, no
> hardware acceleration.
>
>> LIBGL_DEBUG=verbose glxgears -info -printfps
>
> libGL: XF86DRIGetClientDriverName: 8.28.8 fglrx (screen 0)
> libGL: OpenDriver: trying /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/fglrx_dri.so
> libGL: XF86DRIGetClientDriverName: 8.28.8 fglrx (screen 0)
> drmOpenByBusid: busid is PCI:1:0:0
> drmOpenDevice: minor is 0
> drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0
> drmOpenDevice: open result is 4, (OK)
> drmOpenByBusid: drmOpenMinor returns 4
> drmOpenByBusid: drmGetBusid reports PCI:1:0:0
> Can't open configuration file /etc/drirc: No such file or directory.
> Can't open configuration file /home/uts/.drirc: No such file or directory.
> GL_RENDERER = MOBILITY RADEON X300 Generic
> GL_VERSION = 2.0.6011 (8.28.8)
> GL_VENDOR = ATI Technologies Inc.
> GL_EXTENSIONS = GL_ARB_multitexture GL_EXT_texture_env_add
> GL_EXT_compiled_vertex_array GL_S3_s3tc GL_ARB_depth_texture
> GL_ARB_fragment_program GL_ARB_fragment_program_shadow GL_ARB_fragment_shader
> GL_ARB_multisample GL_ARB_occlusion_query GL_ARB_point_parameters
> GL_ARB_point_sprite GL_ARB_shader_objects GL_ARB_shading_language_100
> GL_ARB_shadow GL_ARB_shadow_ambient GL_ARB_texture_border_clamp
> GL_ARB_texture_compression GL_ARB_texture_cube_map GL_ARB_texture_env_add
> GL_ARB_texture_env_combine GL_ARB_texture_env_crossbar GL_ARB_texture_env_dot3
> GL_ARB_texture_float GL_ARB_texture_mirrored_repeat GL_ARB_texture_rectangle
> GL_ARB_transpose_matrix GL_ARB_vertex_blend GL_ARB_vertex_buffer_object
> GL_ARB_vertex_program GL_ARB_vertex_shader GL_ARB_window_pos GL_ARB_draw_buffers
> GL_ATI_draw_buffers GL_ATI_element_array GL_ATI_envmap_bumpmap
> GL_ATI_fragment_shader GL_ATI_map_object_buffer GL_ATI_separate_stencil
> GL_ATI_texture_env_combine3 GL_ATI_texture_float GL_ATI_texture_mirror_once
> GL_ATI_vertex_array_object GL_ATI_vertex_attrib_array_object
> GL_ATI_vertex_streams GL_ATIX_texture_env_combine3 GL_ATIX_texture_env_route
> GL_ATIX_vertex_shader_output_point_size GL_EXT_abgr GL_EXT_bgra
> GL_EXT_blend_color GL_EXT_blend_func_separate GL_EXT_blend_minmax
> GL_EXT_blend_subtract GL_EXT_clip_volume_hint GL_EXT_draw_range_elements
> GL_EXT_fog_coord GL_EXT_framebuffer_object GL_EXT_multi_draw_arrays
> GL_EXT_packed_pixels GL_EXT_point_parameters GL_EXT_rescale_normal
> GL_EXT_secondary_color GL_EXT_separate_specular_color GL_EXT_shadow_funcs
> GL_EXT_stencil_wrap GL_EXT_texgen_reflection GL_EXT_texture3D
> GL_EXT_texture_compression_s3tc GL_EXT_texture_cube_map
> GL_EXT_texture_edge_clamp GL_EXT_texture_env_combine GL_EXT_texture_env_dot3
> GL_EXT_texture_filter_anisotropic GL_EXT_texture_lod_bias
> GL_EXT_texture_mirror_clamp GL_EXT_texture_object GL_EXT_texture_rectangle
> GL_EXT_vertex_array GL_EXT_vertex_shader GL_HP_occlusion_test GL_NV_blend_square
> GL_NV_occlusion_query GL_NV_texgen_reflection GL_SGI_color_matrix
> GL_SGIS_generate_mipmap GL_SGIS_texture_border_clamp GL_SGIS_texture_edge_clamp
> GL_SGIS_texture_lod GL_SUN_multi_draw_arrays
> 1071 frames in 5.0 seconds = 214.110 FPS
> 1102 frames in 5.0 seconds = 219.492 FPS
> 1120 frames in 5.0 seconds = 223.824 FPS
> 1127 frames in 5.0 seconds = 225.386 FPS
> 1133 frames in 5.0 seconds = 226.586 FPS
> 1132 frames in 5.0 seconds = 226.386 FPS
> 1130 frames in 5.0 seconds = 225.986 FPS
> 1135 frames in 5.0 seconds = 226.985 FPS
>
>> assuming a bash-shell; and
>>
>> aticonfig --list-powerstates
>
> core/mem [flags]
> -----------------
> 1: 105/122 MHz [low voltage]
> 2: 209/182 MHz [low voltage]
> * 3: 297/230 MHz [default state]
>
>> Is the "atieventsd" daemon running?
>
> "ps aux |grep atieventsd" returned nothing.
>
>> Is the fglrx kernel module loaded? (/sbin/lsmod)
>
> "lsmod |grep fglrx" returned
>
> fglrx 396524 8
> agpgart 29864 2 fglrx,intel_agp
>
>> Are you using a kind of speedstep?
>> (cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_governor)
>
> performance
>
> I think CPU is running at full speed.
>
>> Which libGL is used on your system? (ls -lF /usr/lib/libGL*)
>
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 10 2006-08-20 01:03 /usr/lib/libGL.so -> libGL.so.1
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 2006-09-17 16:16 /usr/lib/libGL.so.1 -> libGL.so.1.2
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 642476 2006-09-01 01:29 /usr/lib/libGL.so.1.2
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 681050 2006-08-18 02:38 /usr/lib/libGLU.a
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 2006-08-20 01:03 /usr/lib/libGLU.so ->
> libGLU.so.1lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 20 2006-08-20 01:03 /usr/lib/libGLU.so.1
> -> libGLU.so.1.3.060402
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 499216 2006-08-18 02:38 /usr/lib/libGLU.so.1.3.060402
>
>> Regards,
>> Jörg-Volker.
>>
>
> Other info:
> $ uname -a
> Linux t43 2.6.17-2-686 #1 SMP Wed Sep 13 16:34:10 UTC 2006 i686 GNU/Linux
>
> $ fglrxinfo
> display: :0.0 screen: 0
> OpenGL vendor string: ATI Technologies Inc.
> OpenGL renderer string: MOBILITY RADEON X300 Generic
> OpenGL version string: 2.0.6011 (8.28.8)
>
> $ fgl_glxgears
> Using GLX_SGIX_pbuffer
> 1157 frames in 5.0 seconds = 231.400 FPS
> 1905 frames in 5.0 seconds = 381.000 FPS
> 1911 frames in 5.0 seconds = 382.200 FPS
> 1907 frames in 5.0 seconds = 381.400 FPS
> 1911 frames in 5.0 seconds = 382.200 FPS
> 1906 frames in 5.0 seconds = 381.200 FPS
>
> I think fglrx *is* running but somehow hardware acceleration is not enabled.
I have a T41p and am just curious: How can you tell that HW acceleration
is not enabled? Also, you might want to try
grep fglrx /var/log/Xorg.0.log
and look for any warnings (WW) or errors (EE) at the beginning of lines.
Although most of the things that don't work in 8.28 in fact didn't
work in 8.24 either, like HW accel and Composite extension...)
Regards,
André
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFFDRrpkDGKfHXexj8RAhusAJ9wD9kQYGLZrcHtkKOWD53AfNtILQCaAyh7
Wkqbj9GTafazXuZrxx+Rytg=
=1CQQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: