Re: cpufreqd vs. powernowd

To: debian-laptop <debian-laptop@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: cpufreqd vs. powernowd
From: Paul Puschmann <lnx@uzulabs.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 16:35:28 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 42BAC8B0.2040301@uzulabs.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 42BAC1A4.1080001@uzulabs.net>
References: <BAY107-F325921DDF94AF934B97A19ACEA0@phx.gbl> <[🔎] 42BAC1A4.1080001@uzulabs.net>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

AARGH, again the wrong list!

Sorry, Paul
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (MingW32)

iEYEARECAAYFAkK6yLAACgkQqErKtBWD7VRHxQCg+dpuXIjZRFsROQyzsQA1AIo1
7b8AoMvbychaM0Vr1WIPfiPLP/Qsujyk
=FEma
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply to:

References:
- Re: cpufreqd vs. powernowd
  - From: Paul Puschmann <lnx@uzulabs.net>

Prev by Date: Re: cpufreqd vs. powernowd
Next by Date: Re: Debian on Slow laptops. What setup is best?
Previous by thread: Re: cpufreqd vs. powernowd
Next by thread: Stymied configuring XFree86 for 1680x1050 WSXGA+ on HP Compaq nx9600
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread