New hibernate shows strange behaviour
Hello,
yesterday I tried to upgrade my Kernel from 2.6.9 to 2.9.10 as well as
hibernate and ipw2100-source. I had certain trouble with the kernel
which I do not want to discuss in this thread (I just haf fsck errors
which need manual intervention for one partition and later for another
partition - so just remove this beast and have another look AFTER the
upcomming conference events!).
The strange thing is that with my old setup but the new hibernate from
unstable (1.05-1), the SwSusp2 (software-suspend-2.1.5-for-2.6.9) did
not worked as before.
I have:
$ grep -v "^#" /etc/hibernate/hibernate.conf | grep -v "^ *$"
UseSwsusp2 yes
Reboot no
EnableEscape yes
DefaultConsoleLevel 1
SuspendDevice swap:/dev/hda2 ### this setting has no effect
### I have introduced it after observing
### the described problem, but it makes
### no difference
Verbosity 0
LogFile /var/log/hibernate.log
LogVerbosity 1
Distribution debian
SaveClock yes
ChangeGrubMenu yes
GrubMenuFile /boot/grub/menu.lst
AlternateGrubMenuFile /boot/grub/menu-suspended.lst
LockXScreenSaver yes
UnloadBlacklistedModules yes
LoadModules auto
And my /boot/grub/menu-suspended.lst file has the only difference to the
"normal" menu.list that it has a smaller timeout and one entry on top
which says:
title Resume from Suspend on Disk
root (hd0,0)
kernel /vmlinuz root=/dev/hda1 ro vga=791 resume=/dev/hda2
savedefault
boot
This worked perfectly as intended until the upgrade of hibernate. If I now
select the "Resume" entry I get:
---------------------------------------------------------------
Booting 'Resume from Suspend on Disk'
root (hd0,0)
Filesystem Type is ext2fs, partition type 0x83
kernel /vmlinuz root=/dev/hda1 ro vga=791 resume=/dev/hda2
Error 15: File not found
Press any key to continue...
---------------------------------------------------------------
If I afterwards select the "normal" Kernel entry (below the "Resume"
entry) the box is in fact RESUMED instead of a normal Boot as I expected.
Any hint what might went wrong here?
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: