[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: 3com office connect 802.11G installation



It could be that it is not supported yet with one of the tools I installed through apt ... but - when I look at prism54.org - it clearly states that the card is supported :
http://www.prism54.org/supported_cards.php

Full card name <supported_cards.php?sort_by=name>
	Card Model <supported_cards.php?sort_by=model>
	Type <supported_cards.php?sort_by=type>
	Subsystem ID <supported_cards.php?sort_by=subid>
	vendor:device <supported_cards.php?sort_by=vendevid>
	Status <supported_cards.php?sort_by=status>
	Success count <supported_cards.php?sort_by=success_cnt>
	Failure count <supported_cards.php?sort_by=failure_cnt>
	Sucess rate <supported_cards.php?sort_by=success_rate>


	
	

	Cardbus

	PCI

	miniPCI

	AP

	Router


	
	
	

	Unknown

	Success

	Perfect


	New
	New
	New

3com OfficeConnect 11g Wireless LAN PC Card <http://www.3com.com/prod/en_EU_EMEA/detail.jsp?tab=features&sku=3CRWE154G72> 3CRWE154G72 Cardbus 10b7:6001 10b7:6001 Perfect
	87 ++ <supported_cards.php?success_add=1&card_id=23>
	0 ++ <supported_cards.php?failure_add=1&card_id=23>

	100 %


I'm gonna keep on looking into this - anybody else found anything useful ?

thanks already,
Frank

Elaine Tsiang YueLien wrote:

I just researched whether hostap can run with 802.11g. I came to the tentative conclusion that it is not yet supported :

http://lists.shmoo.com/pipermail/hostap/2003-September/004109.html

However:

http://sisyphus.iocaine.com/pipermail/hostap/2003-October/004378.html

I would like to know if anyone has better info than this.

Elaine

I consulted Prism54.org, but that did not seem to help me a lot, or I just don't follow everything ...
Some stuff I tried :
apt-get installed the following :
linux-wlan-ng-modules-2.4.22-1.586tsc
linux-wlan-ng
hostap-modules-2.4.22-1-586tsc
hotplug







--
---
Frank Guthorel

Moriaanstraat 124 9050 Gent - Ledeberg
T:09/329.49.38 - G:0495/105.776

frank@codedor.be - www.codedor.be
---



Reply to: