[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Any debian 2.6.x kernel ACPI success stories?



On Wed, 2004-05-05 at 22:25 +0200, Steinar Bang wrote:
> Has anyone on this list had success with doing suspend/resume using
> the ACPI support in the debian packaged 2.6.x kernels?
> 
> If so, I'm interested in what you did to make it work.  Both s3 and s4
> resume are of interest (though I guess only s4 will ever work with the
> stock 2.6 ACPI support...?).
> 
> The debian users I've seen on http://tuxmobil.org/ and
> http://www.linux-laptop.net/ have used custom built kernels to be able
> to do suspend/resume.

I have had success with ACPI suspend / resume to (RAM|DISK) with 2.6.x
on a Thinkpad R50p.  I have had some problems with:

(a) USB not working after resume.

(b) Some time after resume, my USB mouse and my E1000 network stop
working at the exact same time.

Obviously (b) is not a problem except where (a) has been resolved.  Up
until 2.6.6-rc2 I was using some USB patches, but these appear to have
been already applied to the kernel tree now.

Also, from 2.6.6-rc2 I have been able to:
/etc/init.d/hotplug stop
rmmod e100
modprobe e1000
/etc/init.d/hotplug start

And (b) is fixed.  This approach did not work with some earlier kernels.

My laptop has a Radeon Mobility 9700 (FireGL T2) in it which is not
supported by Xfree86 4.3.0, and suspend/resume did not work with the ATI
binary drivers.  Until today I have been using Vesa.

Yesterday I downloaded and built X.Org X11R6.7, and I can now use the
"ati" driver, and suspend / resume works with this (to RAM, at least - I
haven't tried suspend to disk yet).

Does anyone know of any Debian packaged version of X.Org R6.7 ?

Regards,
					Andrew.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Andrew @ Catalyst .Net .NZ  Ltd,  PO Box 11-053,  Manners St,  Wellington
WEB: http://catalyst.net.nz/             PHYS: Level 2, 150-154 Willis St
DDI: +64(4)916-7201       MOB: +64(21)635-694      OFFICE: +64(4)499-2267
                        
-------------------------------------------------------------------------



Reply to: