The big difference is that 192.168.0.0/24 is not subnetted (well, kinda) 192.168.0.0/16 is 256 networks of 254 users. at least by RFC just as 176.16.0.0/12 and 10.0.0.0/8 are 16 networks of 2**16-2 users and 1 network of 2**24-2 users. Jason PS, David, cram hard for that CCNA, only about 75% is networking knowhow, the rest is the ability to use completely crammed cisco knowledge. On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 14:35, David Woyciesjes wrote: > David Z Maze wrote: > > > > David Woyciesjes <dwoyciesjes@comcast.net> writes: > > > > > Praveen Kallakuri wrote: > > > > > >> secondly, how can i split 1.x into different subnets? > > > > > > I'll have to look it up, but it involves using a subnet mask like > > > 255.255.224.0 instead of the usual 255.255.255.0. This way you can have > > > a subnet with space for only a few machines, instead of the 254 spots > > > you get with using 192.168.1.x with 255.255.255.0 as the subnet mask. > > > > If you wanted four identical networks -- say, 192.168.1.0/26, > > 192.168.1.64/26, 192.168.1.128/26, and 192.168.1.192/26 -- you'd set > > the netmask to 255.255.255.192. > > But, do you lose the first and last network ranges? > > And, the usual 192.168.1.x IP range (with 255.255.255.0 subnet mask) > that most people use for home, can be written shorthand as > 192.168.1.x/24. > > > Q: Is 192.168.1.60 on 192.168.1.0/26? > > > > A: See if a bitwise AND of the address in question and the netmask > > equals the network address: > > > > 192.168. 1. 60 > > AND 255.255.255.192 > > --------------- > > 192.168. 1. 0 <== YES! > > > > Q: What does 192.168.1.128/26 mean? > > > > A: It means that the network address is 192.168.1.128, and the netmask > > is a 32-bit word with the high 26 bits set. These get broken up into > > four groups of eight ("octets"); the three highest octets have all > > eight bits set, for decimal 255, and the last is 11000000, for decimal > > 128+64=192. > > But, for the 192.168.1.x/26 network subnet, 192.168.1.128 can't be used > for a computer in that subnet, because it's the address for the subnet > section. > Rephrased... > Each IP Address subnet range, (say, 192.168.1.x with a subnet mask of > 255.255.255.0) has a network address, which is the first IP address of > the subnet- 192.168.1.0 in this case. And the last IP address is the > broadcast address for that subnet - 192.168.1.255. That leaves 254 > address for machines on that subnet. > > Since we're using a 192.168.1.x/26 subnet, it gets broken down into 4 > subnets: > network address - broadcast address > 192.168.1.0 - 192.168.1.63 > 192.168.1.64 - 192.168.1.127 > 192.168.1.128 - 192.168.1.191 > 192.168.1.192 - 192.168.1.255 > ...which leaves only 62 available IP addresses in each subnet. > > Here's how this applies to home use... > Say your home network has 30 machines. Assign them address between > 192.168.1.129 and 192.168.1.190, and use 192.168.1.192 for the subnet > mask. Now you can safely assume that any traffic from a 192.168.1.x > address, that is outside your subnet, is spoofed. Or something like > that... :) > Also, you can create even smaller subnets if you like, too. I think the > smallest usable subnet only allows 6 IP addresses. > Yep, I'll definitely bring my books with me tomorrow... > > -- > --- Dave Woyciesjes > --- ICQ# 905818 -- ############################################################################### # Jason Straw -- jstraw@resample.com # # Resampling Stats, Inc. -- Systems Administratior, Web Developer # # Statistics.com -- Web Developer # ###############################################################################
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part