Re: RFC: Create d-user-woody, d-user-sarge maillists, deactivate d-user
On Tue, 02 Dec 2003 00:57:03 +0100, "François TOURDE"
<fra-dl-no-spam@tourde.org> said:
> Le 12387ième jour après Epoch,
> hereon1@fastmail.us écrivait:
>
> > Since many questions in the debian-laptop list are user oriented
> > questions,
> > I thought it would be helpful to the Debian community to ensure the
> > readers here are aware of the following message I just sent to the
> > debian-user list.
> >
> > RFC: Create d-user-woody, d-user-sarge maillists, deactivate d-user
>
> I think that create a d-u-stable and d-u-testing is a good idea for
> distrib level specific questions, but deactivating d-u is a bad
> idea. How can people be aware that a question is level specific? I
> think that d-u is good for general questions.
>
> About d-u-unstable, I'm not sure a ML is a good idea. Why not using
> devel, so close to unstable? And inform non-devel user of the unstable
> distrib that it is a bad idea to use unstable if they are not aware of
> the BTS and other tools ?
>
> My 2¢.
>
> --
> The more control, the more that requires control.
Thanks! Great msg! :)
I'll summarize responses & repost within a week.
--
http://www.fastmail.fm - A no graphics, no pop-ups email service
Reply to: