[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: SpeedStep / Geyserville lockups?



on Mon, May 14, 2001 at 07:08:40PM +0100, Alexander Clouter (alexander.clouter@ic.ac.uk) wrote:
> On Sun, 13 May 2001, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> >
> > Is anyone else out there seeing lockups under 2.2.x (2.2.18 here) with a
> > PIII SpeedStep (aka Geyserville) chip?
> >
> > I've had lockups over the past week I suspect are due to CPU step-speed
> > changes resulting from power source switching.
> >
> isn't there an option in the bios to banish this 'feature'?  I remember
> there being reference to this in a couple of places.  Once disabled I
> guess you could solely use 'CPU Idle' calls to cool your cpu, which I
> assume has the same *effect*.

There is.

I've set CPU speed to "maximum" (forget the precise opts, believe they're
max, min, auto, reverse).  System's been up for 19 hours w/o problems,
previously I was lucky to get an hour.

Note also that SpeedStep is probably more useful under an OS which
doesn't have preemptive multitasking.  My understanding of Win9X/ME was
that it ran at full tilt unless specifically idled, this information
coming from VMWare experiences.  NT/2K and GNU/Linux have an idle cycle
which actually idles the CPU.

What's the CPU Idle call you're referringn to?

Cheers.

-- 
Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com>    http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
 What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?       There is no K5 cabal
  http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/         http://www.kuro5hin.org

Attachment: pgpBfDtXPegMd.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: