[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[DONE] wml://{security/2016/dsa-3440.wml}



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

- --- english/security/2016/dsa-3440.wml	2016-01-12 00:25:11.000000000 +0500
+++ russian/security/2016/dsa-3440.wml	2016-01-12 17:23:38.298041317 +0500
@@ -1,32 +1,33 @@
- -<define-tag description>security update</define-tag>
+#use wml::debian::translation-check translation="1.2" maintainer="Lev Lamberov"
+<define-tag description>обновление безопаÑ?ноÑ?Ñ?и</define-tag>
 <define-tag moreinfo>
- -<p>When sudo is configured to allow a user to edit files under a directory
- -that they can already write to without using sudo, they can actually
- -edit (read and write) arbitrary files. Daniel Svartman reported that a
- -configuration like this might be introduced unintentionally if the
- -editable files are specified using wildcards, for example:</p>
+<p>Ð?Ñ?ли Ñ?Ñ?илиÑ?а sudo наÑ?Ñ?Ñ?оена Ñ?ак, Ñ?Ñ?о полÑ?зоваÑ?елÑ? можеÑ? Ñ?едакÑ?иÑ?оваÑ?Ñ? Ñ?айлÑ? в каÑ?алоге,
+в коÑ?оÑ?ом они Ñ?же до Ñ?Ñ?ого могли вÑ?полнÑ?Ñ?Ñ? запиÑ?Ñ? и без sudo, Ñ?о они могÑ?Ñ?
+Ñ?едакÑ?иÑ?оваÑ?Ñ? (вÑ?полнÑ?Ñ?Ñ? Ñ?Ñ?ение и запиÑ?Ñ?) пÑ?оизволÑ?нÑ?е Ñ?айлÑ?. Ð?Ñ?ниелÑ? СваÑ?Ñ?ман Ñ?ообÑ?ил, Ñ?Ñ?о
+Ñ?акие наÑ?Ñ?Ñ?ойки могÑ?Ñ? бÑ?Ñ?Ñ? вÑ?полненÑ? Ñ?лÑ?Ñ?айно в Ñ?ом Ñ?лÑ?Ñ?ае, еÑ?ли
+Ñ?айлÑ? длÑ? Ñ?едакÑ?иÑ?ованиÑ? Ñ?казÑ?ваÑ?Ñ?Ñ?Ñ? Ñ? иÑ?полÑ?зованием Ñ?аблонов подÑ?Ñ?ановки, напÑ?имеÑ?:</p>
 
 <pre>operator ALL=(root) sudoedit /home/*/*/test.txt</pre>
 
- -<p>The default behaviour of sudo has been changed so that it does not allow
- -editing of a file in a directory that the user can write to, or that is
- -reached by following a symlink in a directory that the user can write
- -to. These restrictions can be disabled, but this is strongly
- -discouraged.</p>
+<p>Ð?о Ñ?молÑ?аниÑ? поведение sudo изменено Ñ?ак, Ñ?Ñ?обÑ? Ñ?едакÑ?иÑ?ование Ñ?айла в
+каÑ?алоге, в коÑ?оÑ?Ñ?й полÑ?зоваÑ?елÑ? можеÑ? вÑ?полнÑ?Ñ?Ñ? запиÑ?Ñ?, либо Ñ?айла,
+коÑ?оÑ?Ñ?й можно оÑ?кÑ?Ñ?Ñ?Ñ? Ñ?еÑ?ез Ñ?имволÑ?нÑ?Ñ? Ñ?Ñ?Ñ?лкÑ? в каÑ?алоге, в коÑ?оÑ?Ñ?й полÑ?зоваÑ?елÑ? можеÑ?
+вÑ?полнÑ?Ñ?Ñ? запиÑ?Ñ?, не Ñ?азÑ?еÑ?алоÑ?Ñ?. ЭÑ?и огÑ?аниÑ?ениÑ? можно оÑ?клÑ?Ñ?иÑ?Ñ?, но делаÑ?Ñ?
+Ñ?Ñ?о не Ñ?екомендÑ?еÑ?Ñ?Ñ?.</p>
 
- -<p>For the oldstable distribution (wheezy), this problem has been fixed
- -in version 1.8.5p2-1+nmu3+deb7u1.</p>
+<p>Ð? пÑ?едÑ?дÑ?Ñ?ем Ñ?Ñ?абилÑ?ном вÑ?пÑ?Ñ?ке (wheezy) Ñ?Ñ?а пÑ?облема бÑ?ла иÑ?пÑ?авлена
+в веÑ?Ñ?ии 1.8.5p2-1+nmu3+deb7u1.</p>
 
- -<p>For the stable distribution (jessie), this problem has been fixed in
- -version 1.8.10p3-1+deb8u3.</p>
+<p>Ð? Ñ?Ñ?абилÑ?ном вÑ?пÑ?Ñ?ке (jessie) Ñ?Ñ?а пÑ?облема бÑ?ла иÑ?пÑ?авлена в
+веÑ?Ñ?ии 1.8.10p3-1+deb8u3.</p>
 
- -<p>For the testing distribution (stretch), this problem has been fixed
- -in version 1.8.15-1.1.</p>
+<p>Ð? Ñ?еÑ?Ñ?иÑ?Ñ?емом вÑ?пÑ?Ñ?ке (stretch) Ñ?Ñ?а пÑ?облема бÑ?ла иÑ?пÑ?авлена
+в веÑ?Ñ?ии 1.8.15-1.1.</p>
 
- -<p>For the unstable distribution (sid), this problem has been fixed in
- -version 1.8.15-1.1.</p>
+<p>Ð? неÑ?Ñ?абилÑ?ном вÑ?пÑ?Ñ?ке (sid) Ñ?Ñ?а пÑ?облема бÑ?ла иÑ?пÑ?авлена в
+веÑ?Ñ?ии 1.8.15-1.1.</p>
 
- -<p>We recommend that you upgrade your sudo packages.</p>
+<p>РекомендÑ?еÑ?Ñ?Ñ? обновиÑ?Ñ? пакеÑ?Ñ? sudo.</p>
 </define-tag>
 
 # do not modify the following line
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=PIX5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: