[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[DONE] wml://security/2015/dla-{127,319,353,213}.wml



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

- --- english/security/2015/dla-127.wml	2016-04-09 01:32:23.000000000 +0500
+++ russian/security/2015/dla-127.wml	2016-04-22 00:07:29.490329354 +0500
@@ -1,11 +1,12 @@
- -<define-tag description>LTS security update</define-tag>
+#use wml::debian::translation-check translation="1.2" maintainer="Lev Lamberov"
+<define-tag description>обновление безопаÑ?ноÑ?Ñ?и LTS</define-tag>
 <define-tag moreinfo>
- -<p>Jonathan Gray and Stanislaw Pitucha found an assertion failure in the
- -way wrapped strings are parsed in Python-YAML, a YAML parser and emitter
- -for Python. An attacker able to load specially crafted YAML input into an
- -application using python-yaml could cause the application to crash.</p>
+<p>Ð?жонаÑ?ан Ð?Ñ?Ñ?й и СÑ?аниÑ?лав Ð?иÑ?Ñ?Ñ?а обнаÑ?Ñ?жили оÑ?ибкÑ? Ñ?Ñ?веÑ?ждениÑ? в
+Ñ?поÑ?обе, иÑ?полÑ?зÑ?емом длÑ? гÑ?аммаÑ?иÑ?еÑ?кого Ñ?азбоÑ?а обÑ?Ñ?нÑ?Ñ?Ñ?Ñ? Ñ?Ñ?Ñ?ок в Python-YAML, модÑ?ле Python длÑ?
+вÑ?полнениÑ? гÑ?аммаÑ?иÑ?еÑ?кого Ñ?азбоÑ?а и Ñ?озданиÑ? YAML. Ð?лоÑ?мÑ?Ñ?ленник, Ñ?поÑ?обнÑ?й загÑ?Ñ?зиÑ?Ñ? Ñ?пеÑ?иалÑ?но Ñ?Ñ?оÑ?миÑ?ованнÑ?е
+вÑ?однÑ?е даннÑ?е в Ñ?оÑ?маÑ?е YAML в пÑ?иложение, иÑ?полÑ?зÑ?Ñ?Ñ?ее python-yaml, можеÑ? вÑ?зваÑ?Ñ? аваÑ?ийнÑ?Ñ? оÑ?Ñ?ановкÑ? Ñ?Ñ?ого пÑ?иложениÑ?.</p>
 
- -<p>For Debian 6 <q>Squeeze</q>, these issues have been fixed in pyyaml version 3.09-5+deb6u1</p>
+<p>Ð? Debian 6 <q>Squeeze</q> Ñ?Ñ?и пÑ?облемÑ? бÑ?ли иÑ?пÑ?авленÑ? в pyyaml веÑ?Ñ?ии 3.09-5+deb6u1</p>
 </define-tag>
 
 # do not modify the following line
- --- english/security/2015/dla-213.wml	2016-04-08 01:27:55.000000000 +0500
+++ russian/security/2015/dla-213.wml	2016-04-22 00:14:10.623965535 +0500
@@ -1,14 +1,15 @@
- -<define-tag description>LTS security update</define-tag>
+#use wml::debian::translation-check translation="1.2" maintainer="Lev Lamberov"
+<define-tag description>обновление безопаÑ?ноÑ?Ñ?и LTS</define-tag>
 <define-tag moreinfo>
- -<p>Several vulnerabilities have been discovered in OpenJDK, an
- -implementation of the Oracle Java platform, resulting in the execution
- -of arbitrary code, breakouts of the Java sandbox, information
- -disclosure or denial of service.</p>
+<p>Ð? OpenJDK, Ñ?еализаÑ?ии плаÑ?Ñ?оÑ?мÑ? Oracle Java, бÑ?ло обнаÑ?Ñ?жено неÑ?колÑ?ко
+Ñ?Ñ?звимоÑ?Ñ?ей, пÑ?иводÑ?Ñ?иÑ? к вÑ?полнениÑ? пÑ?оизволÑ?ного кода,
+вÑ?Ñ?одÑ? за пÑ?еделÑ? пеÑ?оÑ?ниÑ?Ñ? Java, Ñ?аÑ?кÑ?Ñ?Ñ?иÑ? инÑ?оÑ?маÑ?ии
+или оÑ?казÑ? в обÑ?лÑ?живании.</p>
 
- -<p>For Debian 6 <q>Squeeze</q>, these problems have been fixed in version
+<p>Ð? Debian 6 <q>Squeeze</q> Ñ?Ñ?и пÑ?облемÑ? бÑ?ли иÑ?пÑ?авленÑ? в веÑ?Ñ?ии
 6b35-1.13.7-1~deb6u1.</p>
 
- -<p>We recommend that you upgrade your openjdk-6 packages.</p>
+<p>РекомендÑ?еÑ?Ñ?Ñ? обновиÑ?Ñ? пакеÑ?Ñ? openjdk-6 packages.</p>
 </define-tag>
 
 # do not modify the following line
- --- english/security/2015/dla-319.wml	2016-04-08 01:27:56.000000000 +0500
+++ russian/security/2015/dla-319.wml	2016-04-22 00:09:44.845714598 +0500
@@ -1,12 +1,13 @@
- -<define-tag description>LTS security update</define-tag>
+#use wml::debian::translation-check translation="1.2" maintainer="Lev Lamberov"
+<define-tag description>обновление безопаÑ?ноÑ?Ñ?и LTS</define-tag>
 <define-tag moreinfo>
- -<p>Sergey Gorbaty reported issues related to the FreeType font engine.
- -FreeType improperly handled certain malformed font files, allowing
- -remote attackers to cause a Denial of Service when specially crafted
- -font files were used.</p>
+<p>СеÑ?гей Ð?оÑ?баÑ?Ñ?й Ñ?ообÑ?ил о пÑ?облемаÑ?, Ñ?вÑ?заннÑ?Ñ? Ñ? движком Ñ?Ñ?иÑ?Ñ?ов FreeType.
+FreeType непÑ?авилÑ?но обÑ?абаÑ?Ñ?ваеÑ? некоÑ?оÑ?Ñ?е непÑ?авилÑ?нÑ?е Ñ?айлÑ? Ñ?Ñ?иÑ?Ñ?ов, Ñ?Ñ?о позволÑ?еÑ?
+Ñ?далÑ?ннÑ?м злоÑ?мÑ?Ñ?ленникам вÑ?зÑ?ваÑ?Ñ? оÑ?каз в обÑ?лÑ?живании в Ñ?лÑ?Ñ?ае иÑ?полÑ?зованиÑ?
+Ñ?пеÑ?иалÑ?но Ñ?Ñ?оÑ?миÑ?ованнÑ?Ñ? Ñ?айлов Ñ?Ñ?иÑ?Ñ?ов.</p>
 
- -<p>For Debian 6 <q>Squeeze</q>, these issues have been fixed in freetype version
- -2.4.2-2.1+squeeze6. We recommend you to upgrade your freetype packages.</p>
+<p>Ð? Debian 6 <q>Squeeze</q> Ñ?Ñ?и пÑ?облемÑ? бÑ?ли иÑ?пÑ?авленÑ? в freetype веÑ?Ñ?ии
+2.4.2-2.1+squeeze6. РекомендÑ?еÑ?Ñ?Ñ? обновиÑ?Ñ? пакеÑ?Ñ? freetype.</p>
 </define-tag>
 
 # do not modify the following line
- --- english/security/2015/dla-353.wml	2016-04-07 03:10:36.000000000 +0500
+++ russian/security/2015/dla-353.wml	2016-04-22 00:12:29.036397564 +0500
@@ -1,12 +1,13 @@
- -<define-tag description>LTS security update</define-tag>
+#use wml::debian::translation-check translation="1.1" maintainer="Lev Lamberov"
+<define-tag description>обновление безопаÑ?ноÑ?Ñ?и LTS</define-tag>
 <define-tag moreinfo>
- -<p>Submitting specially crafted icons (.ico) or .pict images to ImageMagick
- -can trigger integer overflows that can lead to buffer overflows and
- -memory allocations issues. Depending on the case, this can lead to a
- -denial of service or possibly worse.</p>
+<p>Ð?еÑ?едаÑ?а ImageMagick Ñ?пеÑ?иалÑ?но Ñ?Ñ?оÑ?миÑ?ованнÑ?Ñ? иконок (.ico) или изобÑ?ажений в Ñ?оÑ?маÑ?е .pict
+можеÑ? пÑ?иводиÑ?Ñ? к пеÑ?еполнениÑ? динамиÑ?еÑ?кой памÑ?Ñ?и, коÑ?оÑ?аÑ? пÑ?иводиÑ? к пеÑ?еполнениÑ? бÑ?Ñ?еÑ?а и
+оÑ?ибкам вÑ?делениÑ? памÑ?Ñ?и. Ð? завиÑ?имоÑ?Ñ?и оÑ? конкÑ?еÑ?ного Ñ?лÑ?Ñ?аÑ? Ñ?Ñ?о можеÑ? пÑ?иводиÑ?Ñ?
+к оÑ?казÑ? в обÑ?лÑ?живании или даже Ñ?емÑ?-Ñ?о еÑ?Ñ? более плоÑ?омÑ?.</p>
 
- -<p>For Debian 6 Squeeze, those issues have been fixed in imagemagick
- -8:6.6.0.4-3+squeeze7. We recommend that you upgrade your packages.</p>
+<p>Ð? Debian 6 Squeeze Ñ?Ñ?и пÑ?облемÑ? бÑ?ли иÑ?пÑ?авленÑ? в imagemagick
+веÑ?Ñ?ии 8:6.6.0.4-3+squeeze7. РекомендÑ?еÑ?Ñ?Ñ? обновиÑ?Ñ? пакеÑ?Ñ?.</p>
 </define-tag>
 
 # do not modify the following line
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=5E+c
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: