[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[DONE] wml://{security/2016/dsa-3539.wml}



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

- --- english/security/2016/dsa-3539.wml	2016-04-02 14:57:31.000000000 +0500
+++ russian/security/2016/dsa-3539.wml	2016-04-02 18:14:22.423227943 +0500
@@ -1,18 +1,19 @@
- -<define-tag description>security update</define-tag>
+#use wml::debian::translation-check translation="1.1" maintainer="Lev Lamberov"
+<define-tag description>обновление безопаÑ?ноÑ?Ñ?и</define-tag>
 <define-tag moreinfo>
- -<p>Randell Jesup and the Firefox team discovered that srtp, Cisco's
- -reference implementation of the Secure Real-time Transport Protocol
- -(SRTP), does not properly handle RTP header CSRC count and extension
- -header length. A remote attacker can exploit this vulnerability to crash
- -an application linked against libsrtp, resulting in a denial of service.</p>
+<p>Рендел Ð?жеÑ?ап и команда Firefox обнаÑ?Ñ?жили, Ñ?Ñ?о srtp, обÑ?азÑ?оваÑ?
+Ñ?еализаÑ?иÑ? пÑ?оÑ?окола SRTP оÑ? Cisco, непÑ?авилÑ?но обÑ?абаÑ?Ñ?ваеÑ?
+Ñ?Ñ?Ñ?Ñ?Ñ?ик CSRC заголовка RTP и Ñ?аÑ?Ñ?иÑ?ение длинÑ?
+заголовка. УдалÑ?ннÑ?й злоÑ?мÑ?Ñ?ленник можеÑ? иÑ?полÑ?зоваÑ?Ñ? Ñ?Ñ?Ñ? Ñ?Ñ?звимоÑ?Ñ?Ñ? длÑ?
+аваÑ?ийной оÑ?Ñ?ановки пÑ?иложениÑ?, Ñ?компонованного Ñ? libsrtp, Ñ?Ñ?о пÑ?иводиÑ? к оÑ?казÑ? в обÑ?лÑ?живании.</p>
 
- -<p>For the oldstable distribution (wheezy), this problem has been fixed
- -in version 1.4.4+20100615~dfsg-2+deb7u2.</p>
+<p>Ð? пÑ?едÑ?дÑ?Ñ?ем Ñ?Ñ?абилÑ?ном вÑ?пÑ?Ñ?ке (wheezy) Ñ?Ñ?а пÑ?облема бÑ?ла иÑ?пÑ?авлена
+в веÑ?Ñ?ии 1.4.4+20100615~dfsg-2+deb7u2.</p>
 
- -<p>For the stable distribution (jessie), this problem has been fixed in
- -version 1.4.5~20130609~dfsg-1.1+deb8u1.</p>
+<p>Ð? Ñ?Ñ?абилÑ?ном вÑ?пÑ?Ñ?ке (jessie) Ñ?Ñ?а пÑ?облема бÑ?ла иÑ?пÑ?авлена в
+веÑ?Ñ?ии 1.4.5~20130609~dfsg-1.1+deb8u1.</p>
 
- -<p>We recommend that you upgrade your srtp packages.</p>
+<p>РекомендÑ?еÑ?Ñ?Ñ? обновиÑ?Ñ? пакеÑ?Ñ? srtp.</p>
 </define-tag>
 
 # do not modify the following line
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=ARE3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: