[DONE] wml://{security/2016/dsa-3450.wml}
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
- --- english/security/2016/dsa-3450.wml 2016-01-21 00:06:50.000000000 +0500
+++ russian/security/2016/dsa-3450.wml 2016-01-21 00:41:21.011936607 +0500
@@ -1,17 +1,18 @@
- -<define-tag description>security update</define-tag>
+#use wml::debian::translation-check translation="1.1" maintainer="Lev Lamberov"
+<define-tag description>обновление безопаÑ?ноÑ?Ñ?и</define-tag>
<define-tag moreinfo>
- -<p>Jann Horn discovered that the setuid-root mount.ecryptfs_private helper
- -in the ecryptfs-utils would mount over any target directory that the
- -user owns, including a directory in procfs. A local attacker could use
- -this flaw to escalate his privileges.</p>
+<p>Ян ХоÑ?н обнаÑ?Ñ?жил, Ñ?Ñ?о вÑ?помогаÑ?елÑ?наÑ? Ñ?Ñ?илиÑ?а mount.ecryptfs_private, имеÑ?Ñ?аÑ?
+Ñ?лаг пÑ?ав доÑ?Ñ?Ñ?па, позволÑ?Ñ?Ñ?ий запÑ?Ñ?каÑ?Ñ? еÑ? оÑ? лиÑ?а Ñ?Ñ?пеÑ?полÑ?зоваÑ?елÑ?, из Ñ?оÑ?Ñ?ава ecryptfs-utils вÑ?полнÑ?еÑ?
+монÑ?иÑ?ование в лÑ?бой Ñ?елевой каÑ?алог, владелÑ?Ñ?ем коÑ?оÑ?ого Ñ?влÑ?еÑ?Ñ?Ñ? полÑ?зоваÑ?елÑ?, вклÑ?Ñ?аÑ? каÑ?алог
+в procfs. Ð?окалÑ?нÑ?й злоÑ?мÑ?Ñ?ленник можеÑ? иÑ?полÑ?зоваÑ?Ñ? Ñ?Ñ?Ñ? Ñ?Ñ?звимоÑ?Ñ?Ñ? длÑ? повÑ?Ñ?ениÑ? пÑ?ивилегий.</p>
- -<p>For the oldstable distribution (wheezy), this problem has been fixed
- -in version 99-1+deb7u1.</p>
+<p>Ð? пÑ?едÑ?дÑ?Ñ?ем Ñ?Ñ?абилÑ?ном вÑ?пÑ?Ñ?ке (wheezy) Ñ?Ñ?а пÑ?облема бÑ?ла иÑ?пÑ?авлена
+в веÑ?Ñ?ии 99-1+deb7u1.</p>
- -<p>For the stable distribution (jessie), this problem has been fixed in
- -version 103-5+deb8u1.</p>
+<p>Ð? Ñ?Ñ?абилÑ?ном вÑ?пÑ?Ñ?ке (jessie) Ñ?Ñ?а пÑ?облема бÑ?ла иÑ?пÑ?авлена в
+веÑ?Ñ?ии 103-5+deb8u1.</p>
- -<p>We recommend that you upgrade your ecryptfs-utils packages.</p>
+<p>РекомендÑ?еÑ?Ñ?Ñ? обновиÑ?Ñ? пакеÑ?Ñ? ecryptfs-utils.</p>
</define-tag>
# do not modify the following line
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=F0yV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: