[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1022285: marked as done (gnome-hwp-support: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (libnautilus-extension libgsf-1) were not met)

Your message dated Sun, 13 Nov 2022 21:20:40 +0000
with message-id <E1ouKPA-007b36-9d@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1022285: fixed in gnome-hwp-support 0.2.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1022285,
regarding gnome-hwp-support: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (libnautilus-extension libgsf-1) were not met
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1022285: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1022285
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: gnome-hwp-support
Version: 0.1.6-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lucas@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.


Relevant part (hopefully):
> checking for xgettext... (cached) /usr/bin/xgettext
> checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config
> checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes
> checking for libgsf-1 gdk-pixbuf-2.0... yes
> checking for libnautilus-extension libgsf-1... no
> configure: error: Package requirements (libnautilus-extension libgsf-1) were not met
> 
> No package 'libnautilus-extension' found
> 
> Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you
> installed software in a non-standard prefix.
> 
> Alternatively, you may set the environment variables PROPERTIES_CFLAGS
> and PROPERTIES_LIBS to avoid the need to call pkg-config.
> See the pkg-config man page for more details.
> 	tail -v -n \+0 config.log


The full build log is available from:
http://qa-logs.debian.net/2022/10/23/gnome-hwp-support_0.1.6-2_unstable.log

All bugs filed during this archive rebuild are listed at:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-20221023;users=lucas@debian.org
or:
https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na&merged=ign&fnewerval=7&flastmodval=7&fusertag=only&fusertagtag=ftbfs-20221023&fusertaguser=lucas@debian.org&allbugs=1&cseverity=1&ctags=1&caffected=1#results

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

If you reassign this bug to another package, please marking it as 'affects'-ing
this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects

If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine
so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: gnome-hwp-support
Source-Version: 0.2.0-1
Done: Changwoo Ryu <cwryu@debian.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gnome-hwp-support, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 1022285@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Changwoo Ryu <cwryu@debian.org> (supplier of updated gnome-hwp-support package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 05:44:08 +0900
Source: gnome-hwp-support
Architecture: source
Version: 0.2.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Korean L10N <debian-l10n-korean@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Changwoo Ryu <cwryu@debian.org>
Closes: 1022285
Changes:
 gnome-hwp-support (0.2.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   [ Changwoo Ryu ]
   * New upstream version (Closes: #1022285)
   * debian/watch: Updated to work with the github changes
   * debian/copyright: Updated
   * debian/control:
     - Use debhelper 13
     - Standards-Version: 4.6.1
     - Add Rules-Requires-Root
     - Update Build-Depends
   * debian/upstream/metadata: Set upstream metadata fields
   * debian/rules:
     - Install the nautilus properties page again
   * Add Salsa CI settings
Checksums-Sha1:
 ed190e302e6f7067c2ab2e43d0d77e55e0ce932d 2113 gnome-hwp-support_0.2.0-1.dsc
 0dd5122b94fd9a8473a489809bbae75240632044 21214 gnome-hwp-support_0.2.0.orig.tar.gz
 20d5e2524c9afa02abb41975c5bb44b52408f4ff 2724 gnome-hwp-support_0.2.0-1.debian.tar.xz
 638a6176ce59dcb7e7c325a4e6d7a50fcbebf395 15996 gnome-hwp-support_0.2.0-1_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 65e418a0ddb366dad862a1ae164ab51594a3486898cfffc32ad929af283a6831 2113 gnome-hwp-support_0.2.0-1.dsc
 4dd1ce5b717de2ac59aa34f9bc3e08bf3c67bb950511e48e2ddcf6d5ec590828 21214 gnome-hwp-support_0.2.0.orig.tar.gz
 09b70188a6d65c5d4093c3a1b66aeb790b7251d392a03fd732176566e9f0fb10 2724 gnome-hwp-support_0.2.0-1.debian.tar.xz
 f0c8e6dca293b1900c7029f5c097e16e731882f94aabd3de597515f346407adb 15996 gnome-hwp-support_0.2.0-1_source.buildinfo
Files:
 f63a76a1865e9381b76dc6afe2e9d353 2113 gnome optional gnome-hwp-support_0.2.0-1.dsc
 3bd3ae9de1a225e0ad4ecc44ef014705 21214 gnome optional gnome-hwp-support_0.2.0.orig.tar.gz
 7a7688f665461e7222e0de44f7fb0472 2724 gnome optional gnome-hwp-support_0.2.0-1.debian.tar.xz
 005784b61166878330660eaa2da8488d 15996 gnome optional gnome-hwp-support_0.2.0-1_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=IPgS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
Reply to: