Bug#734269: license of package is GPL and not LGPL

To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#734269: license of package is GPL and not LGPL
From: Thorsten Alteholz <alteholz@debian.org>
Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2014 13:09:04 +0100 (CET)
Message-id: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.64.1401051302220.28111@tor.gallien.in-chemnitz.de>
Reply-to: Thorsten Alteholz <alteholz@debian.org>, 734269@bugs.debian.org

Package: qimhangul
Severity: serious
User: alteholz@debian.org
Usertags: ftp
X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org
thanks

Dear Maintainer,

according to debian/copyright the license of this software is LGPL-2.1+

According to the header in most of the files, the software is licensedunder GPL-2+.

Can you please update the information in debian/copyright?

Thanks!
  Thorsten

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Bug#734269: marked as done (license of package is GPL and not LGPL)
  - From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)

Prev by Date: Processed: tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW
Next by Date: Bug#706167: marked as done (qimhangul-qt4: improper alternative handling in M-A:same package)
Previous by thread: Processed: tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW
Next by thread: Bug#734269: marked as done (license of package is GPL and not LGPL)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread