Re: base, essential, core - important terminology question. (fwd)
a kérdés és az 1. válasz (sorry, nem erős az angolom):
To: SmartList <debian-i18n@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: base, essential, core - important terminology question.
Resent-Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 23:37:44 -0600 (CST)
Resent-From: debian-i18n@lists.debian.org
On 26/02/2006, at 3:26 AM, SZERVĂ?C Attila wrote:
>
> These terms are hard for my team during the translation.
>
> We can't find clear policies! I can't see the exact relations :
>
> Base system - package: various priority & variuos sections: e.g.
> Required/base Important/admin Standard/libs even Extra
> packages
>
> Core packages - What is the difference ? What is `Core' exactly ? I
> can't translate as `most_important, standard or base'
> packages 'cause `Important' & `Standard' are priorities
> (see above), `Base' is a section.
>
> Essential packages - a new term again (mainly used in higher pm's -
> aptitude for example) - What is the difference ?
> What is
> `Essential' exactly ? I can't translate as
> `most_important,
> standard, base or core' packages 'cause `Important' &
> `Standard' are priorities (see above), `Base' is a
> section
> & `core package' is undefined term in other tools.
>
> I think these (&others) are wrongly mixed, imperfectly_defined terms
> FUD-ding users (so translators too), isn't it?
>
> Can anyone help to solve this problem?
I agree with you, these terms are difficult to distinguish.
My language has separate translations for these three terms, but they
are still so similar: how does the user distinguish them? If s/he
needs to prioritize, which packages are the most important?
_________________________________________________________________________
from Clytie (vi-VN, Vietnamese free-software translation team / nhĂłm
Vi�t hóa phần m�m t᝹ do)
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/vi-VN
Reply to: