[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: request for small translation for cvsd



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


> Why do you don't call autogen.sh in debian/rules when ./configure
> doesn't exist? I also had to install automake-1.8. I hope your source
> code contains ./configure otherwise don't forget to add automake-1.8 to
> Build-Depends:.

I call ./autogen.sh before I build the source tarball. The configure
script and neccesary autoconf/automake files are in the source tarball.

> During the configuration I see: "separated list of repositories to
> serve. The location of these repositories is relative to the specified
> chroot jail () and should start with".
>
> Maybe you should use ${rootjail:-not yet set} instead of ${rootjail} or
> something similar for cases where rootjail is undefined.

Hmm. That would require a retranslation and I just got my translations in
sync again. Maybe I will do this together with the next change to my
templates file. Maybe then also a change to the template is in order for
cases where no chroot jail is specified.

You did direct me to a bug though, thanks for that. The template was
filled with the wrong value causing the rootjail to always be empty in
this question and if it was working it would not have use any changes from
the fist question. This will also be fixed.

> I removed all these fuzzy flags but I also modified the translation of
> "memorylocked" to "size of locked memory", etc. This makes more sense.
> Maybe you should also change "maxproc" into "number of proc." since you
> cannot limit a maximal number, but you can set it.

The names that are currently used are the ones that cvsd uses in the
configfile. I think they are more or less commonly used names for the
resource limits. They are also used in the maintainer scripts so I would
rather not change the english texts. Someone suggested adding an English
translation which may be an option.

> I attached a patch against the specified file.

Thanks. I'll use this in the upcoming release. Thanks a lot for your time.

- -- arthur - adejong@debian.org - http://people.debian.org/~adejong --
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAgEloVYan35+NCKcRAss6AJ9TQFVH4afMH/mnb1PJJJ/xlkRtlQCguU76
3oADzFag0DMq/zFYN0Kwg4o=
=yaLV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: