Re: [RFR2] wml://lts/security/2021/dla-25{68,69,70}.wml

To: debian-l10n-french@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [RFR2] wml://lts/security/2021/dla-25{68,69,70}.wml
From: Baptiste Jammet <baptiste@mailoo.org>
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2021 21:08:27 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20210301210827.0497fc15@endor.maison>
In-reply-to: <20210220083752.323f5889@debian>
References: <20210220071121.00388fff@debian> <543bfd9e-41d5-008b-f29a-d1d38907b24d@laposte.net> <20210220083752.323f5889@debian>

Bonjour, 

Dixit JP Guillonneau, le 20/02/2021 :
>D’autres commentaires.

Il y a un problème de balise dans la dla-2569 :
-<tt>urllib.parse.parse_qsl<tt>
+<tt>urllib.parse.parse_qsl</tt>
À renvoyer en VO aussi.

Baptiste

Attachment: pgpd3MyEdJx9l.pgp
Description: Signature digitale OpenPGP

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFR2] wml://lts/security/2021/dla-25{68,69,70}.wml
  - From: Jean-Pierre Giraud <jenapierregiraud75@free.fr>

Prev by Date: Re: [RFR2] wml://lts/security/2021/dla-25{51,52,59,66,67,71,72}.wml
Next by Date: Re: [RFR2] wml://lts/security/2021/dla-255{0,2,3,4,5}.wml
Previous by thread: [DONE] wml://lts/security/2021/dla-25{51,52,59,66,67,71,72}.wml
Next by thread: Re: [RFR2] wml://lts/security/2021/dla-25{68,69,70}.wml
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread