--
<define-tag pagetitle>Élection 2003 du responsable du projet Debian</define-tag>
<define-tag status>F</define-tag>
#use wml::debian::template title="<pagetitle>"
#use wml::debian::translation-check translation="1.21" maintainer="Nicolas Bertolissio"
<table>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong>Calendrier</strong> :</td>
<td valign="top">
<table>
<tr>
<th valign="top">Période de dépôt des candidatures :</th>
<td valign="top">24 janvier 2003 00:00:01 UTC</td>
<td valign="top">14 février 2003 00:00:00 UTC</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top">Période de campagne :</th>
<td valign="top">14 février 2003 00:00:01 UTC</td>
<td valign="top">8 mars 2003 00:00:00 UTC</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top">Période de scrutin :</th>
<td valign="top">8 mars 2003 00:00:01 UTC</td>
<td valign="top">30 mars 2003 00:00:00 UTC</td>
</tr>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong>Candidats</strong> :</td>
<td valign="top">
<ol>
<li>Moshe Zadka [<email moshez@debian.org>]
[<a href="platforms/moshez">programme</a>] ;</li>
<li>Bdale Garbee [<email bdale@debian.org>]
[<a href="platforms/bdale">programme</a>] ;</li>
<li>Branden Robinson [<email branden@debian.org>]
[<a href="platforms/branden">programme</a>] ;</li>
<li>Martin Michlmayr [<email tbm@debian.org>]
[<a href="platforms/tbm">programme</a>].</li>
</ol>
<p>
Le bulletin peut être reçu par courriel en envoyant un message à <a
href="mailto:ballot@vote.debian.org";>ballot@vote.debian.org</a> avec le
sujet « leader2003 ».
</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong>Débats</strong> :</td>
<td valign="top">
<p>
Prévu du 7 mars 2003 à 22:00:00 UTC, sur le serveur IRC
<kbd>irc.freenode.net</kbd>. Il y aura deux canaux appropriés, à
savoir, <em>#debian-dpl-debate</em>, et <em>#debian-dpl-discuss</em>.
Le canal <em>#debian-dpl-debate</em> sera modéré. Tout le monde pourra
voir le déroulement du débat, mais seuls les candidats, le modérateur
et les personnes participant à la discussion immédiate pourront poster
des messages. Le canal <em>#debian-dpl-discuss</em> ne sera pas
modéré, et tout le monde pourra y poster des messages, le but est de
permettre des discussions libres en temps réel sur les réponses des
candidats aux questions du débat.
</p>
<p>
Journaux condensés des canaux, avec l'aimable autorisation de David B.
Harris :
</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="dpl-debate.log">#debian-dpl-debate</a> ;</li>
<li><a href="dpl-discuss.log">#debian-dpl-discuss</a>.</li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong>Données et statistiques</strong> :</td>
<td valign="top">
<p>
Des <a href="leader2003_stats">statistiques</a> sur les bulletins et
les accusés de réception sont rassemblées périodiquement durant la
période du scrutin. De plus, la liste des <a
href="leader2003_voters.txt">votants</a> pour l'élection est
disponible, y sont ajoutés les émargements qui permettent aux votants de
vérifier que leur vote a bien été pris en compte. La <a
href="leader2003_tally.txt">feuille d'enregistrement</a> est
également disponible. Dans le tableau suivant, la correspondance
ligne[x] colonne[y] représente les suffrages où le
candidat x bat le candidat y.
</p>
<table align="center">
<tr>
<th> </th>
<th>1</th>
<th>2</th>
<th>3</th>
<th>4</th>
<th>5</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>1</th>
<td> </td>
<td>34</td>
<td>66</td>
<td>38</td>
<td>228</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>2</th>
<td>428</td>
<td> </td>
<td>238</td>
<td>224</td>
<td>449</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>3</th>
<td>385</td>
<td>221</td>
<td> </td>
<td>226</td>
<td>405</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>4</th>
<td>397</td>
<td>228</td>
<td>237</td>
<td> </td>
<td>424</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>5</th>
<td>202</td>
<td>29</td>
<td>65</td>
<td>39</td>
<td> </td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>
En regardant à la ligne 2, colonne 1, le candidat 2
(Bdale Garbee) bat le candidat 1 (Moshe Zadka) par
428 voix.
</p>
<p>
En regardant à la ligne 1, colonne 2, le candidat 1
(Moshe Zadka) bat le candidat 2 (Bdale Garbee) par 34 voix.
</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong>Quorum</strong> :</td>
<td valign="top">
Avec 831 développeurs, Q=14,41353531, ce qui fait un quorum de
43,2406059, soit, arrondi par excès, 44. Seul un candidats n'atteint pas
ce quorum.
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong>Résultat</strong> :</td>
<td valign="top">
<p>
Le vainqueur de cette élection est Martin Michlmayr.
</p>
<p>
Je tiens à remercier Moshe Zadka, Branden Robinson et Bdale Garbee pour
leur implication dans le projet, pour s'être portés candidats au poste
de responsable du projet, et pour avoir offert aux développeurs un
solide choix de candidats.
</p>
<p>
Nombre de suffrages exprimés : 488, soit un taux de participation
de 58,60409 %.
</p>
<p>
<!-- Pairwise election won-lost-tied -->
Décompte des paires gagant-perdant-égalité :
</p>
<table align="center">
<tr>
<th>Moshe Zadka</th>
<td>1-3-0</td>
<!-- votes against in worst defeat/closest victory: 428 -->
<td>votes contre dans la défaite la plus défavorable ou la victoire la plus favorable : 428</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Bdale Garbee</th>
<td>3-1-0</td>
<td>votes contre dans la défaite la plus défavorable ou la victoire la plus favorable : 228</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Branden Robinson</th>
<td>2-2-0</td>
<td>votes contre dans la défaite la plus défavorable ou la victoire la plus favorable : 238</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Martin Michlmayr</th>
<td>4-0-0</td>
<td>votes contre dans la défaite la plus défavorable ou la victoire la plus favorable : 226</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>aucun</th>
<td>0-4-0</td>
<td>votes contre dans la défaite la plus défavorable ou la victoire la plus favorable : 449</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>
1 bat 5 : 228 202 = 26 <br>
2 bat 1 : 428 34 = 394 <br>
2 bat 3 : 238 221 = 17 <br>
2 bat 5 : 449 29 = 420 <br>
3 bat 1 : 385 66 = 319 <br>
3 bat 5 : 405 65 = 340 <br>
4 bat 1 : 397 38 = 359 <br>
4 bat 2 : 228 224 = 4 <br>
4 bat 3 : 237 226 = 11 <br>
4 bat 5 : 424 39 = 385
</p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<define-tag pagetitle>Amendement constitutionnel :: Méthode de vote Condrocet/Clone Proof SSD</define-tag>
<define-tag status>F</define-tag>
#use wml::debian::template title="<pagetitle>" BARETITLE="true" NOHEADER="true"
#use wml::debian::translation-check translation="1.20" maintainer="Nicolas Bertolissio"
{#style#:
<style type="text/css">
address {
color: gray;
background-color: white;
margin-left: -2em;
text-align: right;
}
body {
font-family: Helvetica, Times New Roman, Georgia, serif;
}
h1.center { text-align: center; }
h1.title {
text-align: center;
font-variant: small-caps;
font-family: helvetica, Verdana, Myriad Web, Syntax, sans-serif;
font-weight: bold;
text-transform: capitalize;
text-shadow: 0.3em 0.3em 0.1em #F00;
}
.titletext {
color: black;
background-color: white;
font-size: 18pt;
font-weight: bold;
margin-bottom: -10px;
}
p.initial:first-letter {font-size: 215%; float: left }
p + p { text-indent: 2em }
</style>
:##}
<h1 class="title">Amendement constitutionnel :: Méthode de vote Condrocet/Clone Proof SSD</h1>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th valign="top"><strong>Date</strong> :</th>
<td valign="top">\
Proposition : 16 mai 2003<br \>
Début des discussions : vendredi 16 mai 2003 23:59:59 UTC<br \>
Appel au vote : vendredi 6 juin 2003 23:59:59 UTC<br \>
Fin du scrutin : vendredi 20 juin 2003 23:59:59 UTC
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top"><strong>Déposant</strong> :</th>
<td valign="top">Manoj Srivastava [<a href="mailto:srivasta@debian.org";>srivasta@debian.org</a>]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top"><strong>Parrains</strong> :</th>
<td valign="top">
<ol>
<li>Joel Baker [<a href="mailto:fenton@debian.org";>fenton@debian.org</a>]</li>
<li>Colin Walters [<a href="mailto:walters@debian.org";>walters@debian.org</a>]</li>
<li>Ben Collins [<a href="mailto:bcollins@debian.org";>bcollins@debian.org</a>]</li>
<li>Simon Law [<a href="mailto:sfllaw@engmail.uwaterloo.ca";>sfllaw@engmail.uwaterloo.ca</a>]</li>
<li>Fabio Massimo Di Nitto [<a href="mailto:fabbione@fabbione.net";>fabbione@fabbione.net</a>]</li>
<li>Bas Zoetekouw [<a href="mailto:bas@debian.org";>bas@debian.org</a>]</li>
<li>Cesar Mendoza [<a href="mailto:mendoza@debian.org";>mendoza@debian.org</a>]</li>
<li>Guido Trotter [<a href="mailto:ultrotter@debian.org";>ultrotter@debian.org</a>]</li>
<li>Taylor C. Carpenter [<a href="mailto:taylor@debian.org";>taylor@debian.org</a>]</li>
<li>Ian Jackson [<a href="mailto:ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk";>ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk</a>]</li>
</ol>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top"><strong>Texte</strong> :</th>
<td valign="top">
En réponse à une requête, Buddha Buck a fourni un <a
href="http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2003/debian-vote-200306/msg00036.html";>\
résumé</a> de la solution logique pour ce <!-- rationale for this GR -->. Le
texte actuel de ce <!-- GR --> est le suivant :
<pre>
Under 4.2 Procedure [for developers during a general resolution or
election], change item 3 to read:
3. Votes are taken by the Project Secretary. Votes, tallies, and
results are not revealed during the voting period; after the
vote the Project Secretary lists all the votes cast. The voting
period is 2 weeks, but may be varied by up to 1 week by the
Project Leader.
______________________________________________________________________
Under 5.2 Appointment of project leader, change item 7 to read:
7. The decision will be made using the method specified in section
A.6 of the Standard Resolution Procedure. The quorum is the
same as for a General Resolution (s.4.2) and the default
option is "None Of The Above".
______________________________________________________________________
Under 6.1 Powers [of the technical committee], change item 7 to read:
7. Appoint the Chairman of the Technical Committee. The Chairman
is elected by the Committee from its members. All members of
the committee are automatically nominated; the committee votes
starting one week before the post will become vacant (or
immediately, if it is already too late). The members may vote
by public acclamation for any fellow committee member,
including themselves; there is no default option. The vote
finishes when all the members have voted, or when the voting
period has ended. The result is determined using the method
specified in section A.6 of the Standard Resolution Procedure.
______________________________________________________________________
Under A.2 Calling for a vote, change items 2 and 4 to read
2. The proposer or any sponsor of a resolution may call for a vote on that
resolution and all related amendments.
4. The minimum discussion period is counted from the time the last
formal amendment was accepted, or since the whole resolution
was proposed if no amendments have been proposed and accepted.
______________________________________________________________________
Replace A.3 with:
A.3. Voting procedure
1. Each resolution and its related amendments is voted on in a
single ballot that includes an option for the original
resolution, each amendment, and the default option (where
applicable).
2. The default option must not have any supermajority requirements.
Options which do not have an explicit supermajority requirement
have a 1:1 majority requirement.
3. The votes are counted according to the the rules in A.6. The
default option is "Further Discussion", unless specified
otherwise.
4. In cases of doubt the Project Secretary shall decide on matters
of procedure.
______________________________________________________________________
Replace A.5 with:
A.5. Expiry
If a proposed resolution has not been discussed, amended, voted on or
otherwise dealt with for 4 weeks the secretary may issue a statement
that the issue is being withdrawn. If none of the sponsors of any
of the proposals object within a week, the issue is withdrawn.
The secretary may also include suggestions on how to proceed,
if appropriate.
______________________________________________________________________
Replace A.6 with:
A.6 Vote Counting
1. Each voter's ballot ranks the options being voted on. Not all
options need be ranked. Ranked options are considered
preferred to all unranked options. Voters may rank options
equally. Unranked options are considered to be ranked equally
with one another. Details of how ballots may be filled out
will be included in the Call For Votes.
2. If the ballot has a quorum requirement R any options other
than the default option which do not receive at least R votes
ranking that option above the default option are dropped from
consideration.
3. Any (non-default) option which does not defeat the default option
by its required majority ratio is dropped from consideration.
a. Given two options A and B, V(A,B) is the number of voters
who prefer option A over option B.
b. An option A defeats the default option D by a majority
ratio N, if V(A,D) is strictly greater than N * V(D,A).
c. If a supermajority of S:1 is required for A, its majority ratio
is S; otherwise, its majority ratio is 1.
4. From the list of undropped options, we generate a list of
pairwise defeats.
a. An option A defeats an option B, if V(A,B) is strictly greater
than V(B,A).
5. From the list of [undropped] pairwise defeats, we generate a
set of transitive defeats.
a. An option A transitively defeats an option C if A defeats
C or if there is some other option B where A defeats B AND
B transitively defeats C.
6. We construct the Schwartz set from the set of transitive defeats.
a. An option A is in the Schwartz set if for all options B,
either A transitively defeats B, or B does not transitively
defeat A.
7. If there are defeats between options in the Schwartz set,
we drop the weakest such defeats from the list of pairwise
defeats, and return to step 5.
a. A defeat (A,X) is weaker than a defeat (B,Y) if V(A,X)
is less than V(B,Y). Also, (A,X) is weaker than (B,Y) if
V(A,X) is equal to V(B,Y) and V(X,A) is greater than V(Y,B).
b. A weakest defeat is a defeat that has no other defeat weaker
than it. There may be more than one such defeat.
8. If there are no defeats within the Schwartz set, then the winner
is chosen from the options in the Schwartz set. If there is
only one such option, it is the winner. If there are multiple
options, the elector with the casting vote chooses which of those
options wins.
RATIONALE: Options which the voters rank above the default option
are options they find acceptable. Options ranked below the default
options are options they find unacceptable.
______________________________________________________________________
</pre>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top"><strong>Amendements</strong> :</th>
<td valign="top">aucun enregistré</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top"><strong>Quorum</strong> :</th>
<td valign="top">
avec 804 développeurs, Q=14,1774468788, ce qui fait un quorum de
42,5323406364, soit, arrondi par excès, 43.
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong>Données et statistiques</strong> :</td>
<td valign="top">
Des <a href="gr_voting_stats">statistiques</a> sur les bulletins et les
accusés de réception sont rassemblées périodiquement durant la période
du scrutin. De plus, la liste des <a href="gr_voting_voters.txt">\
votants</a> pour l'élection est disponible, y sont ajoutés les
émargements qui permettent aux votants de vérifier que leur vote a bien
été pris en compte. La <a href="gr_voting_tally.txt">feuille
d'enregistrement</a> est également disponible.
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top"><strong>Résultat</strong> :</th>
<td>
<p>
Il y a eu un total de 160 votes uniques. 144 voix étaient
en faveur de la résolution qui dépasse haut la main les 42,53
requises (cela fait 3,3856589 fois le quorum). Le nombre de voix
contre la proposition était de 16. La résolution passe avec une
super-majorité de 9 contre 1, ce qui est supérieur à la majorité de 3
contre 1 requise.
</p>
<p>
Donc cette résolution passe.
</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<hrline>
<address>
<a href="mailto:srivasta@debian.org";>Manoj Srivastava</a>
</address>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature