Re: Review of debputy editor provided docs for packagers

[Justin B Rye <justin.byam.rye@gmail.com>]

Niels Thykier wrote:
> Justin B Rye:
[...]
>> So maybe
>> 
>>   "    The name `same` refers to the fact that the package can satisfy relations only for the same\n"
>>   "    architecture.  However, in this case, variants are co-installable as noted above.\n"
>> 
>> or
>> 
>>   "    The name `same` refers to the fact that the package can satisfy relations only for its own\n"
>>   "    architecture. However, in this case, variants are co-installable as noted above.\n"
>> 
> 
> It seems to be the exactly the same text on either side of that "or" (of the
> different is very subtle). For now, I have chosen the top one, but I am
> curious what the alternative was intended to be (or to be pointed out the
> difference, because I do not see it)

Zoomed-in version:
 [...] can satisfy relations only for the same\n"
 [...] can satisfy relations only for its own\n"
(Oh, and a rogue whitespace change in the second line!)
-- 
JBR	with qualifications in linguistics, experience as a Debian
	sysadmin, and probably no clue about this particular package