Dear Justin, On Sun, Mar 24, 2024 at 05:10:02PM +0000, Justin B Rye wrote: > Okay! Suggested version attached. <3 thank you very much for that lovely & caring review! I love all your changes and will upload shortly! 🤗 > > Description: Sequoia's reimplementation of the GnuPG cli tools (metapackage) > An initialism, so definitely capitalised. > > It's a bit long; maybe the "reimplementation" part can wait for the > long description: > Description: Sequoia's GnuPG CLI tools (metapackage) agreed. > Fair enough, this all looks intelligible. I'll deal with the quoted > descriptions below, but notice that one of them is a "what it is" noun > phrase while the other is a "what it's for" verb phrase - the list > would read a bit more smoothly if they were syntactically parallel. I knew you would find these inconsistancies.. thank you. [...] > But this is essentially repeating the previous paragraph, while > slightly contradicting it. Couldn't we merge the two paragraphs as > something like > > gpg-sq is Sequoia's alternative implementation of a tool following > the GnuPG command line interface. It provides a drop-in but not > feature-complete.replacement for the GnuPG project's gpg. YES. [...] > The previous two descriptions both talked about themselves as packages > when it would make things simpler to keep the focus on the utilities > they contained; this one does some administrative hocus-pocus, so if > anything it would make *more* sense for it to start with "this > package" (and an active verb). :)) thank you, again. I knew it needed someone to look from the distance to have this perspective and be able to express it / point out whats wrong with the previous version. > (g10code? Oh, okay, "ɡ10ᶜᵒᵈᵉ GMBH".) well spotted! :) *thank you*, ***again!*** -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C ⠈⠳⣄ Make racists afraid again.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature