[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

New debconf templates for apt-listchanges



Hi

I added four new debconf templates for apt-listchanges a week ago.
Could you please review them and make suggestions how to improve them?


Template: apt-listchanges/email-format
Type: select
__Choices: text, html
Default: text
_Description: Format of e-mail messages:
 Please choose a format of e-mail copies of the displayed changes.
 .
  text      : plain text message;
  html      : html data with clickable links.


Template: apt-listchanges/headers
Type: boolean
Default: false
_Description: Should apt-listchanges insert headers before changelogs?
 apt-listchanges can insert a header before each package's changelog
 showing the name of the package, and the names of the binary packages
 which are being upgraded (when different from the source package name).
 .
 Note however that displaying headers might make the output a bit harder
 to read as they might contain long lists of names of binary packages.


Template: apt-listchanges/no-network
Type: boolean
Default: false
_Description: Disable retrieving changes over network?
 In rare cases when a binary package does not contain changelog file,
 apt-listchanges by default executes 'apt-get changelog' command
 that tries to download changelog entries from network.
 .
 This behavior can be disabled with this option what might be useful
 for example for systems with limited network connectivity.


Template: apt-listchanges/reverse
Type: boolean
Default: false
_Description: Show changes in the reverse order?
 By default apt-listchanges shows changes for each package in the order
 of their appearance in the relevant changelog or news files - from the
 most recent version of the package to the most oldest one.
 .
 Optionally apt-listchanges can display changes in the opposite order,
 that some people might find more natural: from the oldest changes in
 the package to the newest ones.

Thanks,
robert

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: