Re: DebConf16 brochure review
Bernelle Verster wrote:
> Justin B Rye wrote:
>> I'm not going to be able to help with this unless you can show me the
>> actual *text* that needs reviewing.
> OK, good to know for future reference. The document is currently in a
> pdf, and may have changed from the txt file I had initially
> (attached). I can give a link to it in dropbox perhaps?
> For future reference, what is the ideal?
> * text in a tex tfile (.txt, .odt etc)
> * webpage
> * paste board
> * other?
Well, as far as I'm concerned the best thing to get via a mailinglist
is a copy of (or URL pointing at) the actual current text source
before it's converted into PDF format, so that I can provide diffs
or revised versions. Unfortunately your text version is just
different enough from that PDF source to make it a bit pointless to go
through finding the places where it has typos and missing commas and
I've added my comments on the EditPad page.
JBR with qualifications in linguistics, experience as a Debian
sysadmin, and probably no clue about this particular package