Re: DebConf16 brochure review
Bernelle Verster wrote:
> Justin B Rye wrote:
>> I'm not going to be able to help with this unless you can show me the
>> actual *text* that needs reviewing.
>
> OK, good to know for future reference. The document is currently in a
> pdf, and may have changed from the txt file I had initially
> (attached). I can give a link to it in dropbox perhaps?
>
> For future reference, what is the ideal?
> * text in a tex tfile (.txt, .odt etc)
> * webpage
> * paste board
> * other?
Well, as far as I'm concerned the best thing to get via a mailinglist
is a copy of (or URL pointing at) the actual current text source
before it's converted into PDF format, so that I can provide diffs
or revised versions. Unfortunately your text version is just
different enough from that PDF source to make it a bit pointless to go
through finding the places where it has typos and missing commas and
so on.
I've added my comments on the EditPad page.
--
JBR with qualifications in linguistics, experience as a Debian
sysadmin, and probably no clue about this particular package
Reply to: