[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

R: Bug#795808: [RFR] templates://virtualbox-ext-pack/{templates}



Hi Christian!
thanks for the review!

just two nitpicks


ackanowledge -- typo
licence -- well correct but called license everywhere else...

(italian translation coming shortly)

cheers,

G.

------------------------------
Il mer 2 set 2015 07:12 CEST, Christian PERRIER ha scritto:

>Please find, for review, the debconf templates and packages descriptions for the virtualbox-ext-pack source package.
>
>This review will last from Wednesday, September 02, 2015 to Saturday, September 12, 2015.
>
>Please send reviews as unified diffs (diff -u) against the original
>files. Comments about your proposed changes will be appreciated.
>
>Your review should be sent as an answer to this mail.
>
>When appropriate, I will send intermediate requests for review, with
>"[RFRn]" (n>=2) as a subject tag.
>
>When we will reach a consensus, I send a "Last Chance For
>Comments" mail with "[LCFC]" as a subject tag.
>
>Finally, a summary will be sent to the review bug report,
>and a mail will be sent to this list with "[BTS]" as a subject tag.
>
>Rationale:
>--- virtualbox-ext-pack.old/debian/templates	2015-08-17 07:07:55.696232489 +0200
>+++ virtualbox-ext-pack/debian/templates	2015-09-02 07:11:42.014198500 +0200
>@@ -1,9 +1,12 @@
> Template: virtualbox-ext-pack/license
> Type: boolean
> Default: true
>-#flag:translate:1
>-_Description: Do you accept the terms of this license?
>- VirtualBox Personal Use and Evaluation License (PUEL)
>+#flag:translate:1,2
>+_Description: Do you accept the terms of the VirtualBox PUEL license?
>+ Oracle Corporation requests VirtualBox users to ackanowledge and
>+ accept the "VirtualBox Personal Use and Evaluation License" (PUEL). Please
>+ read the license below. If you accept this licence, the package
>+ installation will continue. If you refuse it, it will be interrupted.
>  .
>  VirtualBox PUEL terms and conditions
>  .
>
>This adds come explanations to users...
>
>-- 
>
>


Reply to: