Re: Bug#672848: please reconsider package description

To: debian-l10n-english@lists.debian.org
Cc: Martin Eberhard Schauer <Martin.E.Schauer@gmx.de>, 672848@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#672848: please reconsider package description
From: Justin B Rye <jbr@edlug.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 11:15:23 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20120518101522.GB5249@xibalba.demon.co.uk>
Mail-followup-to: debian-l10n-english@lists.debian.org, Martin Eberhard Schauer <Martin.E.Schauer@gmx.de>, 672848@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20120514092706.GA14263@xibalba.demon.co.uk>
References: <[🔎] 4FB0AFED.9040303@gmx.de> <[🔎] 20120514092706.GA14263@xibalba.demon.co.uk>

Justin B Rye wrote:
> diff -ru quotatool-1.4.12.pristine/debian/control quotatool-1.4.12/debian/control

I've also submitted a wishlist patch for "quota" - see #673396.
-- 
JBR	with qualifications in linguistics, experience as a Debian
	sysadmin, and probably no clue about this particular package

Reply to:

References:
- Bug#672848: please reconsider package description
  - From: Martin Eberhard Schauer <Martin.E.Schauer@gmx.de>
- Re: Bug#672848: please reconsider package description
  - From: Justin B Rye <jbr@edlug.org.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: Bug#672848: please reconsider package description
Next by Date: Bug#673688: confusing NEWS.Debian message
Previous by thread: Re: Bug#672848: please reconsider package description
Next by thread: Bug#673688: confusing NEWS.Debian message
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread