[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [RFR] templates://graphite-carbon/{graphite-carbon.templates}

Quoting Justin B Rye (jbr@edlug.org.uk):

> Maybe (just maybe - we badly need developer feedback!) it should be:

.../... Thanks, Justin. As usual, I'll  include all of your
suggestions (moreover, I did this review quite in a hurry and wasn't
really careful...probably slightly annoyed by not really understanding
what all this is about (I do my review without online resources to
track information and that's indeed an interesting way to see that our
users need better descriptions..:-)

About your remark about the template asking whether database should be
removed : I think such templates and questions are useful and I don't
expect package maintainer scripts to remove data that would have been
created when the package is used, but not belonging to the package

Indeed, I have a similar question in my own geneweb package and I
really will never turn it into automatically deleting genealogy
databases when the package is purged..:)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: