Re: Bug#453284: Formulation about followup messages is confusing
David Prévot wrote:
> I wonder if the initial order has an implied meaning (aka “if you're not
> sure, use the first one; if you feel like it doesn't fit your need, look
> at the second one, etc.”), and in case we should respect this order
> (keep the default address in the first position), I edited your proposal
> (in bold what I've changed after your proposal so it may be easier to
> spot error I introduced):
I think you're right. The only line I'd tweak now is the last:
> Messages can be sent to the following addresses
> *in order to be filed in the bug tracking system*:
>
> nnn@bugs.debian.org — *such messages* are also sent to the package
> maintainer and forwarded to debian-bugs-dist, but not to the submitter;
>
> nnn-submitter@bugs.debian.org — these are also sent to the submitter
> and forwarded to debian-bugs-dist, but not to the package maintainer;
>
> nnn-maintonly@bugs.debian.org — these are only sent to the package
> maintainer, not to the submitter or debian-bugs-dist;
>
> nnn-quiet@bugs.debian.org — *these are only* filed in the bug tracking
> system (as are all the *previous*), but not sent to anyone else.
^^^^^^^^ ^^^
system (as are all the above), not sent to anyone else.
--
JBR with qualifications in linguistics, experience as a Debian
sysadmin, and probably no clue about this particular package
Reply to: