Quoting Christoph Biedl (debian.axhn@manchmal.in-ulm.de): > Regarding the debconf templates: I'll very likely just use what the > outcome of that discussion here, so qui tacet ... oops, you don't like > Latin :-) Full nice Latin sentences, no problem..:-) > Oh boy, forgot that one. It was very ... insightful as it tought me a > lot about Debian, why so many people are annoyed, or even want to fork > the project. > > So, just ignore it, this needs a full rewrite. As the description > provided by upstream at <http://ngircd.barton.de/> is not suitable > IMHO, I'll discuss it with the author first. > > Your proposed description is not acceptable in several ways. Maybe Justin's last proposal could be a good start evenn though you may certainly want to add more details or correct some wrong assumptiuns made from the original description?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature