[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [RFR] templates://openoffice.org/{templates}



Quoting Rene Engelhard (rene@debian.org):

> _Description: Component registries might be corrupted
>  You are upgrading from a version which might have corrupted
>  service/component registry files (*.rdb).
>  .
>  Especially /var/lib/openoffice/basis3.1/program/services.rdb and the rdbs
>  below /var/spool/openoffice/uno_packages/cache for installed extensions.

This paragraph is not a sentence (no verb) which sounds odd.

I'd propose merging the two paragraphs togeter:

 You are upgrading from a version which might have corrupted
 service/component registry files (*.rdb), especially
 /var/lib/openoffice/basis3.1/program/services.rdb and the rdb files
 in /var/spool/openoffice/uno_packages/cache for installed extensions.

(I have a doubt about the use of "especially" here. I would have used
"particularly", myself...but I'm not the best reference for this..:-)

>  .
>  If you experience problems with the component manager or segmentation faults
>  in either unopkg or OOo which involve store, please check those
>  (and eventually cleanly reinstall the packages and/or use a clean user profile)

"OOo" might sound as jargon to unskilled users. If that template is
likely to be seen by Joe User when upgrading from Lenny to Squeeze,
I'd recommend using "OpenOffice.org"

The sentence dot is missing in that last paragraph, so:

 If you experience problems with the component manager or segmentation
 faults in either unopkg or OpenOffice.org which involve store, please
 check those (and eventually cleanly reinstall the packages and/or use
 a clean user profile).



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: