Re: Driver injection disk debconf templates in D-I
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 09:29:40PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> >> I also reported a bug suggesting to lower the priority at which this
> >> template is displayed.
> > It's a main menu item. Doesn't the priority of udeb menu item
> > templates affect either a) whether the udeb is *run* by default, or
> > b) nothing (I can't remember which)?
> I suspect Christian was refering to the debconf question presented by
> the package. It is using debconf priority high to ask if the detected
> drive should be used to load drivers. I suspect its priority should
> be lowered to medium as Christian suggests.
> The menu item do not have a debconf priority, and thus its menu
> handling is not affected by any debconf priority. :)
> There is also the template priority which affect what translators work
> on, and there I suspect Christians changes were correct. This new
> udeb is not used in the common case, and its translations should thus
> not be very high priority.
Oh, sorry for misunderstanding. Yes, if this is about the priority of the
question about whether to *use* the driver disk that's been found, I think
medium (with a default answer of 'yes') seems reasonable.
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/