Re: [RFR] templates://crm114/{crm114.templates}
>>>>> "CP" == Christian Perrier <bubulle@debian.org> writes:
CP> Whether or not the tool is accurate or "good" should not go in
CP> the package description, still.
General characteristics such as "good" shouldn't be there. Specific
characteristics such as high classification accuracy of a classifier
should be there.
CP> One of the most discouraged bahavior is indeed comparison with
CP> another similar software....not only, indeed, because this is
CP> advertising, but also because that may change over time (and
CP> package descriptions nearly never change over time).
I compared crm114 to bogofilter just to answer the Justin's question,
with no direct relation to the package description.
CP> I'd recommend explaining (briefly) *what* makes the software
CP> good....more than just say it is good..:-)
Sure, this is why I've originally said that the description should
retain the facts that crm114 is very accurate and learns fast; these
facts are important for users looking for classifiers. Anyway the
original description should be changed, how about something like (I'm
sure you can improve the wording):
- Accuracy of the SBPH/BCR classifier has been seen in excess of 99 per cent,
- for 1/4 megabyte of learning text. In other words, CRM114 learns, and it
- learns fast.
+ Some of the categorization methods can classify with very high accuracy
+ after learning only relatively small amount of input text.
Reply to: