I feel the need to add the following precision about my work method for reviews, mostly between RFR and LCFC. You may be surprised by not seeing me answering to suggestions made after a request for review... Indeed when all suggestions make sense to me, I just integrate them silently. This is always the case for about 99% for suggestions made by Justin, who I trust blindly after more than 2 years of constant work in reviewing various stuff. So, when reviewed texts are proposed as LCFC, they always integrate received suggestions. That may leave room for improvement as it does not really encourage other reviewers to step up. Please say so if that the case and if an RFR2 would help. Otherwise, please assume that the file posted by the reviewer *is* indeed the RFR2 file and, thus, followup on that review. Please, of course, don't take this anything else than "I don't have enough time for ACKs and express regards"... I really put a lot of value in you guys work and your reviews are certainly what keeps all this process working (oh my....my English is really too poor for me to express what I really wanted to say here...hope you'll get the point anyway). I just felt like I had to say this. Now let's go back to run through my mail reading..:-) --
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature