Christian Perrier wrote: > The first step of the process is to review the debconf source > template file(s) of cernlib. This review will start on Thursday, November 22, 2007, or > as soon as you acknowledge this mail with an agreement for us to > carry out this process. > > All parts of the process will be carried out in close collaboration > with you, and, unless you explicitely ask for it, no upload nor NMU > will happen for cernlib. > > If you approve this process, please let us know by replying to this > mail. If some work in progress on your side would conflict with such a > rewrite (such as adding or removing debconf templates), please say so, > and we will defer the review to later in the development cycle. Christian, this seems OK to me. Just two things to note: a) my position at Princeton is ending this Wednesday, so after that please explicitly email to my Debian account <kmccarty@debian.org> or my Gmail account <kmccarty@gmail.com> (where I will change my Debian email forwarding to point anyway). b) currently I'm waiting on Camm's packages (atlas, blas, lapack) to start the transition to gfortran, and after that I will have to spend some time testing the gfortran-transitioned cernlib packages. So any changes to Debconf templates and translations, while they will be welcome, might not be uploaded to Debian for some time. Hope this is not a problem. best regards, -- Kevin B. McCarty <kmccarty@princeton.edu> Physics Department WWW: http://www.princeton.edu/~kmccarty/ Princeton University GPG: public key ID 4F83C751 Princeton, NJ 08544
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature