Quoting Frank Küster (frank@kuesterei.ch): > > - A weekly cron job will also take care of updating the data collected now, > > - so usually you won't need to worry about them whenever you install new > > + A weekly cron job will also take care of updating this data, > > + and therefore no specific action is required whenever you install new > > (La)TeX packages or remove old ones. > > > > slightly simplify the sentence > > I'm not the maintainer of auctex, just someone who cares for it (and > might well submit later patches to the templates), but here's my two > cent: > > I'm a bit old-fashioned here, so this wording hurts. Please, s/this > data/these data/. Sure. I just did s/this/these as of now. We'll see with others' comments. > > > > Standards-Version: 3.7.2 > > -Build-Depends-Indep: emacs22 | emacs21 | emacs-snapshot, eperl, gs-gpl | gs, po-debconf, texlive-latex-base, texinfo, texi2html (>=1.76-1) > > +Homepage: http://www.gnu.org/software/auctex/ > > Hm, you don't want to replace the B-D-I by the Homepage field, do you? Sure again. Just a mistake. The Homepage field is of course *added*. > This is only half correct, content-wise. The package refuses to work > with XEmacs, but the auctex version in XEmacs is often quite old. I > don't know the current state in Debian, but generally when you ask > upstream it all boils down to "You shouldn't use XEmacs when you want > AUCTeX", and vice versa. > > I don't have a good suggestion to phrase that in a neutral way which > doesn't sound deprecatingly to anyone... I made this the following: As XEmacs is shipped with a custom (and rather old) version of AUCTeX version, this package should only be used with GNU/Emacs. > > > Package: preview-latex-style > > Architecture: all > > Depends: tex-common > > Recommends: doc-base > > Conflicts: preview-latex (<=0.7.3-2) > > -Description: LaTeX style files for editor embedded preview of some environments > > - These style files are allow previewing LaTeX environments such as math or > > - figures in editors which support it. > > - . > > - Homepage: http://www.gnu.org/software/auctex/preview-latex.html > > +Homepage: http://www.gnu.org/software/auctex/preview-latex.html > > +Description: preview LaTeX output inside Emacsen > > I don't think that is a good description. IMO, the interesting point is > indeed that particular parts (actually environments and commands) of a > LaTeX document are replaced by an embedded version of the output. > Therefore, "embedded" should be kept, and I think using "environments" > is better than not mentioning at all that we are dealing with parts. > I went back to: Description: LaTeX style files for editor-embedded preview of some environments So, just adding an hyphen....
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature