Quoting Aaron M. Ucko (email@example.com): > [Apologies for not replying sooner; I've been busy with other > matters.] > > In general, I'm pretty happy with this draft; thanks for the > suggestions! My one concern is that the descriptions alternate > between starting with the package name and "this package"; while I'm > willing to go either way (acknowledging the futility of avoiding the > latter), I'd prefer to do so consistently. This will be corrected in the final version you'll get as a bug report when the LCFC period is over (put "this package" everywhere).
Description: Digital signature