[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[LCFC] templates://x-ttcidfont-conf/{templates}



This is the last call for comments for the review of debconf
templates for x-ttcidfont-conf.

The reviewed templates will be sent on Wednesday, October 31, 2007 to the package
maintainer as a bug report and a mail will be sent to this list with
"[BTS]" as a subject tag.


-- 


Template: x-ttcidfont-conf/tt_backend
Type: select
Choices: freetype, xtt
Default: freetype
_Description: Backend to use for TrueType handling on X:
 Two backends can handle TrueType fonts: FreeType and X-TT.
 .
 The standard FreeType has simple features, while X-TT
 offers a TrueType fonts decoration mechanism that can create bold and
 oblique faces from a single font.
 .
 If in doubt, you should choose FreeType.

Template: x-ttcidfont-conf/xtt_vl
Type: boolean
_Description: Prefer speed over quality while rendering?
 There are two ways for XTT to calculate the font metrics:
 .
  - user header info:      fast and lightweight but fallible;
  - calculate every glyph: slow and heavyweight but reliable.
 .
 With a fast CPU and enough memory, you should decline this option and
 XTT will calculate every glyph.
Source: x-ttcidfont-conf
Section: x11
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Anibal Monsalve Salazar <anibal@debian.org>
Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4)
Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper (>= 4), defoma (>= 0.11.8)
Standards-Version: 3.7.2
Uploaders: Adeodato Simó <dato@net.com.org.es>

Package: x-ttcidfont-conf
Architecture: all
Depends: defoma (>= 0.5.0), ${misc:Depends}, xutils, xfonts-encodings (>= 1:1.0.0-5.1) | xfonts-base (<< 1:1)
Conflicts: psfontmgr (<= 0.4.0)
Description: TrueType and CID fonts configuration for X
 This package configures TrueType fonts and CID fonts (as well as CMaps)
 for X. It generates .scale and .alias files from TrueType and CID
 fonts registered to Defoma, and calls mkfontdir (and mkcfm).
 .
 The package supports both X-TT and FreeType X backends.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: