> Some further suggested changes for the control file: As usual, very pertinent (enlish or frenglish?) changes. All included. > > Current recommended way to mention upstream's home page until the use > > of a "Homepage:" field in debian/control is widely accepted. > > (I think someone on debian-mentors was saying it's supported in dpkg > now, but that would just mean it's time to start using both...) Hmmm, I should trigger that discussion in -devel so that we can have a stance here. I don't really like recommending to put the upstream home page in two places, so we'd better be sure that we can recommend to use "Homepage:" or not. Sure, dpkg supports it but what about other tools. Does using it increase the risk of breaking something else?
Description: Digital signature