[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [ITR] templates://krb5/{krb5-admin-server.templates,krb5-kdc.templates}

Quoting Sam Hartman (hartmans@debian.org):
> >>>>> "Christian" == Christian Perrier <bubulle@debian.org> writes:
>     Christian> Quoting Sam Hartman (hartmans@debian.org):
>     >> Reviewing the krb5 templates now is fine.  However I ask that
>     >> you also include my co-maintainer rra@debian.org in the
>     >> discussions.
>     Christian> Will try to remember but, as our standard policy is to
>     Christian> mail packages@p.d.o, it indeed depends on how Russ is
>     Christian> listed in the debian/control field..
> I think that policy could be significantly improved.  Why not also
> include one of the @packages.qa.debian.org addresses that people can
> subscribe to?

I tried to balance this when we launched the process.

However, depending on the various choices done in debian/control, the
safest option if using *both* packages.d.o and packages.qa.d.o.

However, I somewhat fear that some maintainers could complain about
receiving two notices, in some conditions.

But I'm personnally opened to hear about other advices and change our

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: