Quoting Sam Hartman (firstname.lastname@example.org): > >>>>> "Christian" == Christian Perrier <email@example.com> writes: > > Christian> Quoting Sam Hartman (firstname.lastname@example.org): > >> Reviewing the krb5 templates now is fine. However I ask that > >> you also include my co-maintainer email@example.com in the > >> discussions. > > > Christian> Will try to remember but, as our standard policy is to > Christian> mail firstname.lastname@example.org, it indeed depends on how Russ is > Christian> listed in the debian/control field.. > > I think that policy could be significantly improved. Why not also > include one of the @packages.qa.debian.org addresses that people can > subscribe to? I tried to balance this when we launched the process. However, depending on the various choices done in debian/control, the safest option if using *both* packages.d.o and packages.qa.d.o. However, I somewhat fear that some maintainers could complain about receiving two notices, in some conditions. But I'm personnally opened to hear about other advices and change our policy.
Description: Digital signature