[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1123619: /usr/share/bug/linux-image-6.17.11+deb14-amd64/presubj: Regression: IMC Networks USB2.0 UVC 2M WebCam found but unusable (was ok in image 6.17.9)



Hi Salvatore,

Sorry for top posting. Quickly, I am almost sure now that it is a hardware failure from my laptop. Even using the old kernel now works only from time to time. First I thought a bad state could survive across reboot but now i just think it depends on the heat of the laptop... Last time i even had a BIOS error before to boot. This cannot be related to the kernel. 

Thank you for the time you took to guide me, sorry for the noise. Please close this bugreport.

Best regards,
 Benoît 

Le 20 décembre 2025 23:05:55 GMT+01:00, "Benoît Rouits" <brouits@free.fr> a écrit :
>Hi Salvatore,
>
>Sorry for top posting. Quickly, I am almost sure now that it is a hardware failure from my laptop. Even using the old kernel now works only from time to time. First I thought a bad state could survive across reboot but now i just think it depends on the heat of the laptop... Last time i even had a BIOS error before to boot. This cannot be related to the kernel. 
>
>Thank you for the time you took to guide me, sorry for the noise. Please close this bugreport. Merry 
>
>Le 20 décembre 2025 13:46:58 GMT+01:00, Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> a écrit :
>>Hi Benoît,
>>
>>On Fri, Dec 19, 2025 at 11:30:59PM +0100, Benoît Rouits wrote:
>>> Hi Salvatore,
>>> 
>>> Le 19/12/2025 à 23:09, Salvatore Bonaccorso a écrit :
>>> > Source: linux
>>> > Source-Version: 6.18.2-1~exp1
>>> > 
>>> > Hi Benoît,
>>> > 
>>> > On Fri, Dec 19, 2025 at 11:02:26PM +0100, Benoît Rouits wrote:
>>> > > Hi Salvatore,
>>> > > 
>>> > > Thank you for your reply and bissect explanation.
>>> > > 
>>> > > As a quick top-post Reply: 6.18.2-1~exp1 works for me \o/
>>> > > 
>>> > > I think, then, the bissection isn't worth it. But if you need it for the
>>> > > record, just ask me.
>>> > 
>>> > Thanks for quickly testing. No in this case I guess bisecting
>>> > 6.17.9..6.17.11 is bit waste of time. You might as well test 6.17.13
>>> > which I'm going to upload after 6.17.12 migrates to testing, but the
>>> > plan is to move to 6.18.y after that.
>>> > 
>>> 
>>> Ahm... my previous mail was too optimistic: I ran into the same issue again
>>> after rebooting a second time on 6.18.2-1~exp1.
>>> 
>>> If i reboot to 6.17.9 the issue disappear, and rebooting on 6.18.2-1~exp1
>>> works good. But booting twice on 6.18.2-1~exp1 does not.
>>> 
>>> I'm not sure if it is a hardware problem, or a hardware state.
>>> 
>>> I will investigate more tomorrow.
>>
>>I have reopened the bug, thanks for reporting back quickly.
>>
>>Regards,
>>Salvatore


Reply to: