[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

linux-signed-arm64_6.18~rc7+1~exp1_source.changes ACCEPTED into experimental



Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

Mapping rc-buggy to experimental.

Accepted:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2025 17:51:01 +0100
Source: linux-signed-arm64
Architecture: source
Version: 6.18~rc7+1~exp1
Distribution: rc-buggy
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team <debian-kernel@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
Changes:
 linux-signed-arm64 (6.18~rc7+1~exp1) experimental; urgency=medium
 .
   * Sign kernel from linux 6.18~rc7-1~exp1
 .
   * New upstream release candidate.
     - mm/huge_memory: Fix initialization of huge zero folio (Closes: #1121013)
 .
   [ Bastian Blank ]
   * Introduce a base package for version sync.
 .
   [Anatoliy Gunya]
   * [arm64] Add initial Raspberry Pi 5 support
     - enable MMC_SDHCI_BRCMSTB, GPIO_BRCMSTB, PINCTRL_BRCMSTB
       and PINCTRL_BCM2712 as modules
     - enable OF_OVERLAY
     - enable MISC_RP1 as a module
Checksums-Sha1:
 bc879b91ca1a7232408d22974c52710d97b1c9e8 8043 linux-signed-arm64_6.18~rc7+1~exp1.dsc
 f5ccf78445e85cc114f3570d19038f391ba23204 697228 linux-signed-arm64_6.18~rc7+1~exp1.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 46e78ad29e521b2d38f792b4f544a016253ff764dedd2edc826f778907045b79 8043 linux-signed-arm64_6.18~rc7+1~exp1.dsc
 4cdf6a35958bca1b2fdeb79b694e1225497471d4e87ae8ff10673629d7298dcd 697228 linux-signed-arm64_6.18~rc7+1~exp1.tar.xz
Files:
 6824e540e3a47c7649c18f2f9ab7b46c 8043 kernel optional linux-signed-arm64_6.18~rc7+1~exp1.dsc
 1459b390f52e21724e2ea85f431c1c95 697228 kernel optional linux-signed-arm64_6.18~rc7+1~exp1.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEARYIAB0WIQSInBJdRTWyTRy0ztFCTVFtUgONCgUCaSTlBQAKCRBCTVFtUgON
CiTEAP9WazHu3qhowxfoU1mSSs3Nkgxih6HRrm6G0f74lIuyKQD/QSUwofX1g2/R
b8aJan3dEVCSSp0hXEwDTU4Y1YCv5Ag=
=GwqB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Attachment: pgpmzSRCfiBkG.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: