Bug#1113942: 6.16.5 affected, but neither 6.15.3 nor 6.16.1. Looks like a regression between 6.16.1 and 6.16.3.
Hi Philipp,
On Sun, Sep 21, 2025 at 09:28:09AM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 01:09:04PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 05:28:14PM +0200, Philipp Klaus Krause wrote:
> > > I've now tried some of the kernels at
> > > https://snapshot.debian.org/package/linux-signed-amd64/
> > >
> > > On 6.15.3 and 6.16.1, I cannot reproduce the issue, but I do see it with
> > > 6.16.5.
> > >
> > > So the last working version for me is 6.16.1-1~exp1,
> > > and the first non-working is 6.16.3-1.
> >
> > I think this should be the same issue as #1114806. There is pending
> > revert for the next upstream version.
> >
> > Would you be able to confirm that reverting commit
> > 165a69a87d6bde85cac2c051fa6da611ca4524f6 from upstream fixes the issue
> > for you? Do you need help building a kernel to confirm this?
> >
> > But looking at your log, I'm leaning to just merge the two bugs
> > already.
>
> FWIW, the 6.16.8-1 version (containing the mentioned revert) is now
> uploaded to unstable, it needs yet processing from NEW, but once
> available it would be great if you can test that (I'm still confident
> that your bug and #1114806 are duplicate and so your issue resolved
> with 6.16.8-1 as well).
Now that this version is present in the archive, can you please test
and report back?
Regards,
Salvatore
Reply to: