Bug#1107579: linux-image-6.1.0-37-amd64 hangs on resume from hibernate

[Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>]

Hello Alessandro,

On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 04:04:54PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello Alessandro,
> 
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 03:29:21PM +0200, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
> > On Thu 26/Jun/2025 17:59:20 +0200 Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > > > ;...]
> > > > 
> > > > I'm unclear about the relationship among Devuan/ Debian 6.1.0-37,
> > > > 6.1.140-1 numbering and the 6.15 or 6.12 used by kernel.org.  I get
> > > > the following:
> > > 
> > > I don't know if Devuan does their own kernel packaging,
> > 
> > 
> > They don't.  The --print-uris option talls me, for example:
> > 
> > root@pcale:# apt-get install --print-uris linux-image-amd64-dbg
> > ...
> > 'http://deb.devuan.org/merged/pool/DEBIAN-SECURITY/updates/main/l/linux/linux-image-6.1.0-37-amd64-dbg_6.1.140-1_amd64.deb' linux-image-6.1.0-37-amd64-dbg_6.1.140-1_amd64.deb 853916720
> > 'http://deb.devuan.org/merged/pool/DEBIAN-SECURITY/updates/main/l/linux/linux-image-amd64-dbg_6.1.140-1_amd64.deb' linux-image-amd64-dbg_6.1.140-1_amd64.deb 1300
> > 
> > But then:
> > 
> > root@pcale:# curl --head http://deb.devuan.org/merged/pool/DEBIAN-SECURITY/updates/main/l/linux/
> > HTTP/1.1 302 Found
> > Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2025 12:44:01 GMT
> > Server: Apache/2.4.62 (Debian)
> > Location: http://deb.debian.org/debian-security/pool/updates/main/l/linux/
> > Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
> > 
> > > but for Debian it's as follows:
> > > [...]
> > 
> > 
> > Thank you so much for clarifying.  It's quite obscure.
> > 
> > 
> > > Try installing http://deb.debian.org/debian/pool/main/l/linux-signed-amd64/linux-image-6.15-amd64_6.15.3-1~exp1_amd64.deb
> > > . The MD5 sum should be c41ea7cd2bf35dc2ef13b6502df9dac0.
> > 
> > 
> > I haven't been able to find what Devuan package points there.  I tried to install it directly, but got the following error:
> > 
> > root@pcale:# dpkg -i linux-image-6.15-amd64_6.15.3-1~exp1_amd64.deb
> > dpkg: regarding linux-image-6.15-amd64_6.15.3-1~exp1_amd64.deb containing linux-image-6.15-amd64, pre-dependency problem:
> >  linux-image-6.15-amd64 pre-depends on linux-base (>= 4.12~)
> >   linux-base is installed, but is version 4.9.
> > 
> > dpkg: error processing archive linux-image-6.15-amd64_6.15.3-1~exp1_amd64.deb (--install):
> >  pre-dependency problem - not installing linux-image-6.15-amd64
> > Errors were encountered while processing:
> >  linux-image-6.15-amd64_6.15.3-1~exp1_amd64.deb
> 
> you need at least linux-base from trixie or bookworm-backports.
> 
> > I got more errors when trying to install linux-base 4.12.  Then I
> > didn't insist because something sounds wrong:  If I'm trying to
> > install a previous version of the kernel, how come it depends to a
> > subsequent version of linux-base?
> 
> I don't understand the confusion. linux-image-6.1.0... depends on
> linux-base (>= 4.3~) and linux-image-6.12... depends on linux-base (>=
> 4.12~). So you need a newer linux-base than available in debian12.
> 
> > In fact, I cannot find 6.15 in the
> > cache:
> > 
> > root@pcale:# apt-cache search linux-image| grep 6.15
> 
> linux-image-6.15 is in debian experimental for now only.
> 
> > root@pcale:#
> > 
> > The highest I can find with apt-cache is a 6.12.27 backport:
> > 
> > root@pcale:# apt-get install --print-uris linux-image-6.12.27+bpo-rt-amd64
> > ...
> > 'http://deb.devuan.org/merged/pool/DEBIAN/main/l/linux-signed-amd64/linux-image-6.12.27%2bbpo-rt-amd64_6.12.27-1%7ebpo12%2b1_amd64.deb' linux-image-6.12.27+bpo-rt-amd64_6.12.27-1~bpo12+1_amd64.deb 107428604
> > 
> > Which is redirected to an URL in the same directory as the 6.15 you suggested:
> > Location: http://deb.debian.org/debian/pool/main/l/linux-signed-amd64/linux-image-6.12.27+bpo-rt-amd64_6.12.27-1~bpo12+1_amd64.deb
> > 
> > 
> > Thinking again, maybe it would be more productive to try and install the latest kernel, in case the problem is fixed there.
> 
> Yeah, 6.15 is a good first approximation for "latest kernel". There is
> 6.16-rc3 upstream already, but that isn't packaged yet.

Did you had any chance to do further test that and have results?

Regards,
Salvatore