Bug#988688: workaround for bug 988688 - disable security chip
- To: Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org>
- Cc: 988688@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#988688: workaround for bug 988688 - disable security chip
- From: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
- Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2025 22:43:26 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] aMXXbhnWDGOcDOtI@eldamar.lan>
- Reply-to: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>, 988688@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <aBI1-Wvv340JiLU_@eldamar.lan>
- References: <162129157752.662161.17678466622683229491.reportbug@yoga-260.matoken.org> <20250307221846.ueukgarofyuu5u5f@chew.redmars.org> <162129157752.662161.17678466622683229491.reportbug@yoga-260.matoken.org> <Z965MYozPtwwFJC0@eldamar.lan> <aAo1Hrqsg1BuA-VS@eldamar.lan> <D9J0USK3EBN7.1FGQAQ5UA472X@debian.org> <162129157752.662161.17678466622683229491.reportbug@yoga-260.matoken.org> <aBI1-Wvv340JiLU_@eldamar.lan> <162129157752.662161.17678466622683229491.reportbug@yoga-260.matoken.org>
Hi Jonathan,
On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 04:38:49PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 10:40:28AM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> >
> > Hi Salvatore,
> >
> > Sorry I have not responded yet, I've been too busy and had to prioritise
> > other things.
> >
> > On Thu Apr 24, 2025 at 1:57 PM BST, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > > Accordingly going to close now the bug. If you feel though strongly
> > > taht it is not okay please *do* reopen, but in that case we really
> > > would need your help for the above.
> >
> > I intend to work on this post-Trixie. I personally would find it useful if
> > the bug was open: Between first discovering it, and finding the bug and
> > useful information in it; and when I hit the bug a second time, a year or
> > more later, it took me longer to find the useful information because the bug
> > was closed and archived. However, I won't re-open it myself without your
> > consent.
>
> Given you have a clear intent to work on it post-trixie, let's reopen
> it. I do not want to hide things, just make things more easy for us
> for issues which are not anymore relevant.
>
> With your above statement, lets keep it open for now.
Did you had a chance to look into this? otherwise as stated earlier it
it would be helpful to not keep bugs open for years and close it.
Regards,
Salvatore
Reply to: